revocable trust Archives - Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

What Is A Revocable Living Trust And Why Should You Have One?

January 8, 2020/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

As the holidays approach, you might be thinking about family more. You want to take care of your loved ones, and while it’s a hard subject to discuss, you need to make sure everything is prepared when something happens to you. The holidays are a good time to put your affairs in order and make sure your estate is in place so that when that time comes, your family can get through the process as easily as possible. If you know anything about probate, you probably know how time-consuming and expensive it is. A revocable living trust creates the opportunity to avoid probate and is an amazing estate planning tool.

What Is A Revocable Living Trust?

So, what is a revocable living trust? A trust is an arrangement with a third party to hold assets that will eventually be passed to a beneficiary. A revocable living trust means that the stipulations of the trust can be changed while the trustor is living and capable, as their situation evolves.

Why Set Up A Living Trust?

A lawyer and client go over paperwork for setting up a revocable living trust

In estate planning, setting up a living trust is recommended for a common reason – to avoid probate. Probate is the lengthy court process in which the passing of assets are determined by a judge. It can take months to several years depending on the case.

Many people don’t even have wills, let alone trusts. Wills are important to putting your affairs in order, but they cannot avoid probate. For assets to pass through a will, you must die first – unlike a living trust – and all assets must go through probate whether you have a will or not. Living trusts are usually able to bypass the probate process altogether, saving your loved ones time and money.

If you live in San Jose or the greater Bay area, set up a free consultation with our estate planning attorneys to learn about living trusts.

How To Set Up A Revocable Trust?

There are a few steps that go into setting up a living trust. You must set up the trust while you are alive. You will need to work with an attorney to figure out the trust’s specifications such as who assets will pass to and how they must pass.

For example, you can create a joint living trust for yourself and your spouse. If one spouse dies, the assets will pass to the living spouse, and after their death, the assets will pass to whomever you name beneficiary next in line. You can stipulate that the assets or property only pass under certain conditions such as if your daughter graduates college. This allows you to control and protect your assets, even after your death.

An attorney hands over keys to a property that was listed in the revocable living trust to the beneficiary.

After you’ve worked with an estate planning attorney to put together a trust, you’ll have to fund the trust. This requires you to place property and assets in the name of the trust. Instead of the property being under the name “John Smith,” it will be titled “John Smith, Trustee of the John Smith Trust.” Forgetting to fund your trust can result in added expenses upon your death and a lengthy process to distribute assets in probate.

Living trusts aren’t right for every situation however, so you should consult with an experienced estate planning attorney before setting one up.

Live in San Jose or close by? Contact Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri to find out if a revocable living trust is right for you.

Understanding the Impact of the Spousal Fiduciary Duty on Estate Planning

March 21, 2017/in Estate Planning, Family Law /by Michael Lonich

We have outlined the spousal fiduciary duty on this blog before; now, we’re delving a bit deeper to discuss the impact of the spousal fiduciary duty on estate planning. Traditionally, California courts rely on a common law burden-shifting framework when confronted with the possibility that a spouse has unduly influenced his/her spouse’s estate planning decisions. However, a 2014 case from a California Court of Appeal—Lintz v. Lintz— took a different approach, and instead, relied on the statutory spousal fiduciary duty articulated in California Family Code section 721 to resolve an estate planning/undue influence claim.

The common law framework provides that the person alleging undue influence bears the burden of proof. However, the challenger can shift the burden to the proponent of a testamentary instrument by establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, three elements: 1) a confidential relationship, 2) active procurement of the instrument, and 3) an undue benefit to the alleged influencer.

Departing from the common law, the Lintz court—faced with an allegedly abusive wife who intimidated her husband into amending his trust to her tremendous benefit and to the extreme detriment of her stepchildren—looked to Family Code section 721 when it decided in favor of the husband’s estate. Section 721 creates a broad fiduciary duty between spouses that demands a duty of “the highest good faith and fair dealing.” Further, neither spouse may take unfair advantage of the other. As a result, if any inter-spousal transaction advantages only one spouse, a statutory presumption arises under section 721 that the advantaged spouse exercised undue influence. The presumption is rebuttable—the advantaged spouse can demonstrate that the disadvantaged spouse’s action was freely and voluntarily made, with full knowledge of the facts, and with a complete understanding of the transaction.

California Family Code section 850 describes three categories of inter-spousal transactions: 1) community property to separate property, 2) separate property to community property, and 3) separate property of one spouse to separate property of other spouse. Notably, the section does not consider transferring community or separate property to trusts.

The court concluded that section 721 applies because section 850 does include property transferred to revocable trusts—in Lintz, Wife’s undue influence caused Husband, via his trust, to transmute a large part of his separate property to community property. Accordingly, the court held that Family Code section 721 creates a presumption of undue influence when one spouse names the other as a beneficiary in a revocable trust.

Criticism of the decision abounds—all estate plans that name a spouse as a beneficiary, by their very nature, benefit one spouse. In turn, use of the Family Code undue influence presumption threatens to disturb all testamentary instruments, and litigation may flood the family courts as spouses seek to rebut the seemingly automatic presumption that Lintz creates. On the other hand, some commenters believe Lintz does not indicate a new paradigm, but rather, showcases a court’s eagerness to remedy the serious injury inflicted by a spouse’s egregious influence.

At the very least, the Lintz case does demonstrate that estate planning and family law are deeply intertwined. Consulting with an attorney to learn how a marriage or divorce can impact your testamentary wishes is always wise. If you have any questions about your family law and/or estate planning needs, please contact the experienced attorneys at Lonich Patton Erlich Policastri—we offer free half-hour consultations.

Lastly, please remember that each individual situation is unique, and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may detail general legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.

SOURCES:

California Family Code section 721

California Family Code section 850

Lintz v. Lintz (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 1346.

No-Contest Clauses in Trusts

October 28, 2011/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

Trusts are incredibly useful estate planning instruments (see Testamentary versus Inter Vivos Trusts blog). They can be drafted and administered in almost any way you want; they can even protect your heirs’ inheritance from creditors (see Spendthrift Clauses blog). Another useful way to ensure that your estate is administered in a particular way is to include a “no-contest” clause in your estate planning documents.

A no-contest clause is a “provision in an otherwise valid instrument that, if enforced, would penalize a beneficiary for filing a pleading in any court.” California Probate Code sections 21310-23315 govern these provisions and define a contest as a “pleading filed with the court by a beneficiary that would result in a penalty under a no-contest clause, if the no contest clause is enforced.” The Probate Code also defines a “direct” contest, which, if brought with probable cause (as defined by statute) does not violate the no-contest clause.

Direct contests allege the invalidity of a protected instrument or one or more of its terms based on forgery; lack of due execution; lack of capacity; menace, duress, fraud, or undue influence; revocation of a will by statute; and/or disqualification of a beneficiary by statute. However, it is important to note that a no-contest clause will only protect the instrument containing the no-contest clause and other instruments only if they were already in existence and expressly identified in the no-contest clause. Accordingly, it is important to consult an experienced estate planning attorney to ensure your estate is protected from contests.

If you are interested in learning more about estate planning and protecting the administration of your estate, contact the San Jose estate planning attorneys at Lonich Patton Erlich Policastri, LLP. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Ensuring the Creation of a Valid Trust

August 15, 2011/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

Many Californians fail to realize that a valid trust is created only if there is trust property. It is, therefore, very important to expressly transfer some piece of property, real or personal to the trust when making estate plans.

Whether property is part of the estate (to be administered by the probate court) or part of a valid trust (to be administered by the trustee) is reserved for the court. While written declarations and general assignments may be effective in transferring property to the trust and avoiding probate, this is not a risk that should be taken. A court must consider each case on its merits and this process typically ties family assets up in litigation, delays administration of the trust, and results in substantial attorney and court fees. An estate plan, designed to ensure that family and financial goals are met, can suddenly become a nightmarish burden on grieving loved ones.

Consulting an experienced estate planning attorney when planning for the future will ensure a trust is properly funded and timely administered. If you are interested in learning more about individual estate planning or creating a comprehensive plan so your family members are well-prepared to handle your estate, contact the San Jose estate planning attorneys at Lonich Patton Erlich Policastri, LLP. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Do You Need a Revocable or Irrevocable Trust?

December 10, 2010/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

If you are confused about the difference between a revocable and irrevocable trust, you are not alone. In fact, they do have some similarities. For example, both revocable and irrevocable trusts allow the settlor (person putting assets in the trust) to distribute or transfer their property as provided for in the trust document.

The main difference between the two trusts is related to the settlor’s control over the trust assets. The settlor of an irrevocable trust generally gives up a large degree of control over the property that he or she transfers into the trust. In addition, the settlor may often derive tax benefits from creating an irrevocable trust.

On the other hand, a revocable trust can be canceled (revoked) at any time. However, the revocable trust often has less significant tax benefits. You may wish to create a revocable trust, regardless of any decrease in tax benefits, if you desire to maintain a large degree of control over the trust property. It is important to work with an experienced estate planning attorney to create an estate plan that fits your lifestyle and goals.

For more information about trusts, please contact us. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.

The Proper Estate Plan May Help You Avoid the Expense and Hassle of Probate

November 23, 2010/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

If you are trying to decide what estate planning instruments you need in order to meet your goals and to avoid the cost of probate, you might want to look into the revocable trust. A revocable trust is the primary testamentary transfer device used by professional estate planners in California. A revocable trust can be used not only to manage your property during your lifetime, but it also serves to distribute your assets upon your passing.

There are several key advantages of a trust. First, it avoids probate. Probate is the court-supervised process of distributing a deceased person’s assets according to their will or California intestacy law. This process can sometimes take over 6 months to complete and can be expensive. For example, the estate of a person with only a will operating to distribute their assets after death would have to carry the costs associated with providing and preparing the initial petition, petitions for instructions, and the petition for final distribution. In addition, costly court hearings to discuss creditor (and other) issues may be required.

Second, a trust can help to maintain confidentiality regarding your assets. Probate proceedings are a part of the public record. This means that anyone is able to access the information in the record regarding your assets and their distribution. If privacy is important to you, a trust can help you achieve greater (but not necessarily complete) confidentiality.

Third, a trust also serves property management functions during your lifetime. With a trust in place, there is no need to incur the costs and inefficiency associated with a formal conservatorship in the event of your lifetime disability or incapacity. In addition, a trust is useful as it provides for long-term continuity for handling your assets.

For more information about wills and trusts, please contact our San Jose estate planning lawyers at Lonich Patton Erlich Policastri for more information. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Selecting a Successor Trustee for Your Revocable Trust

November 22, 2010/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

A “trustee” is a person who is responsible for managing the trust assets. Many individuals choose to name themselves as the trustee of the trust so they can exercise control over the trust during their lifetime. In addition, it is wise to add a successor trustee who will manage the trust assets if you ever become incapacitated or die.

When choosing a person to serve as your trustee or successor trustee, make sure you pick someone who is reliable and honest. The trustee has a vast amount of authority and will not be required to act under the court’s direct supervision.

Just recently, the individuals in charge of the estate of 104 year old heiress, Huguette Clark, have come under attack for some questionable dealings with her estate. A criminal investigation is pending regarding the attorney and accountant in charge of handling Clark’s money. The investigation is looking into the sale of her Stradivarius violin for $6 million and a Renoir painting for $23.5 million. Click here for the full article.

To learn more about successor trustees, please contact us. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Posts