Blog
Free 30-Minute Family Law or Estate Planning Consultation
Contact Us
LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI
1871 The Alameda, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95126
Phone: (408) 553-0801 | Fax: (408) 553-0807 | Email: contact@lpeplaw.com
LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI
Phone: (408) 553-0801
Fax: (408) 553-0807
Email: contact@lpeplaw.com
1871 The Alameda, Suite 400
San Jose, CA 95126
Located in San Jose, Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri handles matters for clients in northern California, specifically San Jose and Silicon Valley. Our services are available to anyone within the following counties: Santa Clara, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Benito, and San Francisco. For a full listing of areas where we practice, please click here.
MAKE A PAYMENT BY SCANNING THE QR CODE BELOW:

DISCLAIMER
This web site is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Nothing in the site is to be considered as either creating an attorney-client relationship between the reader and Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri or as rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. Readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information contained in Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri Web site without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.
About | Why LPEP | Contact | Blog | Data Breach Information
© 2024 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy

The Rise of Cohabitation: Legal Reforms for Unmarried Couples
/in Family Law /by Riley PenningtonMore couples today are choosing to live together without getting married. For some, it’s a step before marriage. For others, it’s a long-term arrangement that better fits their lifestyle and financial goals. While cohabitation has become increasingly common, many unmarried couples are surprised to learn how limited their legal protections can be compared to married spouses.
As family dynamics continue to evolve, legal systems are slowly adapting to address the realities facing unmarried couples, especially when it comes to property, finances, and children.
Cohabitation Is More Common Than Ever
In the past, marriage was often viewed as the default path for couples building a life together. Today, many couples choose cohabitation for personal, financial, or cultural reasons. In high-cost areas like the Bay Area, couples may share homes, finances, and even children for years without legally marrying.
The challenge is that living together does not automatically create the same legal rights that come with marriage.
Many people assume that long-term cohabitation creates “common law marriage” protections, but California does not recognize common law marriage established within the state. That means unmarried couples may not have automatic rights related to property division, financial support, or inheritance if the relationship ends.
Why Legal Planning Matters for Unmarried Couples
When unmarried couples separate, disagreements can quickly arise over shared assets and financial responsibilities. Questions often include:
Without clear legal agreements in place, resolving these disputes can become stressful and expensive.
This is why more couples are turning to cohabitation agreements. These agreements function similarly to prenuptial agreements by outlining how finances, property, and responsibilities will be handled during the relationship and in the event of a breakup.
Legal Reforms Are Slowly Expanding Protections
Across the country, lawmakers and courts have started recognizing that unmarried couples often face many of the same financial and parenting issues as married couples. While legal reforms vary by state, several trends are emerging:
Greater Recognition of Shared Property Interests
Courts are increasingly willing to examine financial contributions made by both partners, especially when one person contributed to mortgage payments, renovations, or shared investments.
Expanded Parenting Protections
For unmarried couples with children, courts continue to focus on the best interests of the child, regardless of the parents’ marital status. Custody and support rights generally apply equally to both parents.
Increased Use of Cohabitation Agreements
More couples are proactively creating legally enforceable agreements to avoid uncertainty and conflict later.
Common Issues Unmarried Couples Overlook
Many unmarried couples delay legal planning because they assume they will “figure it out later.” Unfortunately, that can create serious complications down the road. Some commonly overlooked issues include:
Estate Planning
Without a will or trust, unmarried partners may not automatically inherit assets or have decision-making authority during medical emergencies.
Real Estate Ownership
If both names are not properly documented on property records, disputes can arise over ownership rights.
Financial Accounts and Debt
Shared bank accounts, loans, and credit obligations can become difficult to untangle after a separation.
Protecting Yourself and Your Future
Cohabitation can offer flexibility and independence, but it also requires thoughtful legal planning. Having clear agreements and updated legal documents can help couples avoid unnecessary disputes and protect their financial future.
At LPEP Law, we help Bay Area clients navigate modern family law issues, including cohabitation agreements, property disputes, and long-term planning for unmarried couples. Our team works to provide practical guidance tailored to your unique situation.
If you are living with a partner and want to better understand your legal rights and options, contact our office today to schedule a free consultation and plan for the future with confidence.
Disclaimer: this article does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.
The Intersection of Family Law and Real Estate: What You Need to Know
/in Family Law /by Mitchell EhrlichWhen people think about family law, they often picture divorce, custody arrangements, or support agreements. But one of the biggest issues families face during a major life change is real estate. Whether it’s a family home, rental property, vacation house, or investment portfolio, real estate can quickly become one of the most valuable, and emotionally charged, parts of a family law matter.
The Family Home Is More Than Just Property
For many couples, the family home represents years of financial investment and personal memories. During a divorce or separation, deciding what happens to that property is rarely simple.
Questions often arise, such as:
If one person purchased the property prior to marriage, the situation may become more complicated if marital income was used to pay the mortgage, make renovations, or maintain the home over time.
Property Division Can Get Complicated Quickly
Real estate issues become even more complex when multiple properties are involved. Some couples own rental homes, vacation properties, or investment real estate in addition to their primary residence.
In California, property acquired during the marriage is generally considered community property. However, there are exceptions, especially when inheritances, premarital assets, or separate financial contributions come into play.
This is why documentation matters. Mortgage records, title documents, bank statements, and renovation expenses can all become important when determining how property should be divided.
Timing Matters in Real Estate Decisions
The housing market can significantly impact family law decisions. Selling a property during a strong market may maximize profits, while waiting too long could create financial strain for both parties.
In some situations, one spouse may want to keep the home temporarily so children can remain in the same school district or maintain stability during the transition. In others, selling the property immediately may be the most practical option.
Every family’s situation is different, which is why it’s important to evaluate both the emotional and financial side of the decision.
Hidden Real Estate Issues to Watch For
Real estate matters in family law cases are not always limited to who keeps the house. Other issues can include:
Fair Rental Value
In many cases, one spouse may decide to move out. This can create a claim for the fair rental value against the spouse who remains in the home.
Mortgage/Carrying Costs
Even if one spouse moves out, both parties may still be legally responsible for the mortgage if both names remain on the loan. The spouse paying for the mortgage and other related carrying costs may have a claim for reimbursement.
Property Value Disputes
Couples may disagree on how much a property is worth, especially in competitive real estate markets like the Bay Area.
Tax Consequences
Selling or transferring property can trigger tax implications that should be considered before finalizing any agreement.
Investment Properties
Rental income, property management responsibilities, and third party interests may all factor into negotiations.
Why Professional Guidance Matters
Family law and real estate each involve major financial decisions on their own. When they overlap, the stakes become even higher. Having experienced legal guidance can help you protect your financial future while working toward practical, long-term solutions.
At LPEP Law, our team helps Bay Area families navigate complex family law matters involving homes, investment properties, and other real estate assets. We focus on clear communication, thoughtful strategy, and solutions tailored to your unique circumstances.
If you are facing a divorce, separation, or property dispute involving real estate, the team at LPEP Law can help you understand your options and move forward with confidence. Contact our office today to schedule a free consultation.
Disclaimer: this article does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.
Mental Health Considerations in Family Law Cases
/in Family Law /by Gina PolicastriMental health issues can play a significant role in family law cases, especially divorce, child custody, and protective orders. Although mental health considerations do not automatically determine the outcome of a case, courts must evaluate the best interests of children, parental capacity, decision-making, and family dynamics.
Family law cases are deeply personal. When mental health considerations are also involved, cases become more legally and emotionally complex. Judges are not always able to adequately evaluate a party’s psychological condition. Sometimes this inability is due to limited evidence, refusal to participate in an evaluation, or conflicting expert opinions. The judge might order a formal evaluation, ask for other evidence, or issue temporary orders to protect family members.
Mental Health and Child Custody Decisions
One of the most common ways mental health becomes relevant in family law is during child custody disputes. Generally, family courts are guided by one overarching principle: the best interests of the child.
To determine custody, parenting time, and visitation, courts need to think about whether a parent’s mental health will negatively impact the child. Specifically, can the parent provide a safe and stable home environment? Are they able to meet the child’s emotional and physical needs? Will they communicate and cooperate with the other parent? What is their ability to exercise sound judgment in parenting decisions?
A mental health diagnosis alone is rarely enough to influence custody outcomes. Courts typically focus on how their specific psychological condition issue impacts parenting. Many individuals with anxiety, depression, PTSD, or other psychological condition conditions parent effectively and responsibly.
In some cases, concerns about a parent’s mental health may lead the court to order a psychological or custody evaluation. Licensed mental health professionals will assess parenting capacity, family dynamics, emotional functioning, and any concerns about child safety or welfare.
Mental Health and Domestic Violence Cases
Between 23-25 percent of divorces in the United States cite domestic violence as a factor. Cases may involve a request for a protective order, divorce allegations involving abuse, or custody litigation. Courts need to evaluate how trauma affects both the evidence and the parties involved.
For victims of domestic violence, trauma, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress can affect how they respond during litigation, communication with counsel, and testifying in court. They may appear withdrawn or have difficulty remembering events. Their behavior may seem inconsistent with the traumatic events they are claiming. Abusers may attempt to use the victim’s psychological condition history against them. For instance, claiming that the victim is unfit to parent because of their anxiety or depression.
Trauma-informed legal representation can be especially important. A trauma-informed approach recognizes that emotional responses like fear, avoidance, or difficulty recalling events, may be normal responses to trauma rather than indicators of unreliability.
Protecting Privacy and Sensitive Medical Information
Mental health records are highly personal, and many clients understandably worry about privacy during litigation. Courts may allow certain mental health information to be discussed in court, but only when directly relevant.
Working with an experienced attorney is essential. They can help balance protecting sensitive information and addressing legitimate legal issues. Depending on the circumstances, attorneys may seek to:
The Importance of Documentation and Treatment
At LPEP, we often find our clients are hesitant to seek treatment for mental health issues before or during a family law case. They’re afraid it will reflect negatively on them and harm their case. However, courts often view proactive treatment positively. Seeking treatment is not a weakness. It demonstrates commitment to your well-being and to your family.
If you do seek mental health treatment, documentation can be very important for your case. Try to maintain evidence such as:
Family law cases involving psychological condition require more than legal knowledge. The Family Law Group at LPEP prioritizes sensitivity, discretion, and strategic planning. If you are facing divorce or custody issues where psychological condition issues are involved, schedule a free consultation to discuss your case.
FAQs
Q: Can a parent lose custody because of depression or anxiety?
A: Not necessarily. Many parents successfully manage these mental health conditions and maintain full parental rights. Any legal issues would usually arise if the condition negatively impacts parenting or presents child safety concerns.
Q: What if the other parent falsely claims I have mental health issues?
A: False or exaggerated allegations can sometimes occur in contentious family law cases. Courts typically require evidence rather than speculation or hearsay. Medical records, testimony, and psychological evaluations help separate legitimate concerns from unsupported claims.
Q: How do mental health issues affect divorce proceedings outside of custody?
A: Judges will also consider mental health issues in settlement negotiations, where decision-making capacity is important; in requests for temporary support; in allegations of coercion or abuse; and in enforcement or modification of court orders.
Disclaimer: this article does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.
Estate Planning Pitfalls: Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
/in Estate Planning /by Michael LonichEstate planning isn’t just for the ultra-wealthy; it’s for anyone who wants to protect their family, their assets, and their wishes. Yet many people put it off or make avoidable mistakes that can create stress, confusion, and unnecessary costs down the line. Here are some of the most common estate planning pitfalls and how to avoid them.
Waiting Too Long to Start Estate Planning
One of the biggest mistakes is simply not having a plan at all. Life is busy, and estate planning can feel like something to deal with “later.” But unexpected events don’t follow a timeline.
How to avoid it:
Start with the basics: a will, a durable power of attorney, and a healthcare directive. These foundational documents ensure your wishes are known and reduce uncertainty for your loved ones.
Relying Only on a Will
Many people assume a will is enough. While a will is essential, it doesn’t avoid probate, a legal process that can be time-consuming and costly in California.
How to avoid it:
Consider a revocable living trust. This allows your assets to pass to your beneficiaries without going through probate, saving time and maintaining privacy.
Not Updating Your Plan
Life changes, through marriages, divorces, new children, and new assets, but estate plans often stay frozen in time and can quickly become outdated or no longer aligned with your wishes.
How to avoid it:
Review your estate plan every 3–5 years or after major life events. Keeping your documents current ensures they reflect your actual wishes and circumstances.
Forgetting to Fund Your Trust
Creating a trust is only half the job. If assets aren’t properly transferred into the trust, they may still end up in probate.
How to avoid it:
Work with your attorney to “fund” your trust by retitling assets like real estate, bank accounts, and investments. This step is critical and often overlooked.
Overlooking Beneficiary Designations
Retirement accounts, life insurance policies, and certain financial accounts pass directly to named beneficiaries, regardless of what your will or trust says.
How to avoid it:
Regularly review and update beneficiary designations to ensure they align with your overall estate plan.
Choosing the Wrong Trustee or Executor
Selecting someone to manage your estate is a significant decision. Choosing based solely on family dynamics rather than capability can lead to complications.
How to avoid it:
Pick someone responsible, organized, and capable of handling financial and legal matters. In some cases, a professional trustee may be a better fit.
Take the Next Step in Protecting Your Future
Estate planning doesn’t have to be overwhelming, but it does require thoughtful decisions and regular attention. By avoiding these common pitfalls, you can create a plan that protects your assets and provides peace of mind for you and your loved ones.
If you’re ready to put a plan in place or want to review an existing one, reach out to our experienced estate planning attorneys. A personalized strategy today can save your family time, stress, and unnecessary expense tomorrow.
Contact LPEP today to schedule your free consultation.
Disclaimer: This article does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.
Navigating Family Law Reforms: Quebec’s Proposal for a Unified Family Tribunal
/in Family Law /by Gretchen BogerAt first glance, it may seem like Quebec’s Unified Family Tribunal (UFT) has no impact on family law in the United States. However, family law reform rarely stops at the border. The UFT offers a useful lens for attorneys, judges, and policymakers throughout the United States.
What Quebec’s Unified Family Tribunal Actually Does
Quebec created the UFT to centralize family-related matters into a single court. The Court of Quebec has exclusive jurisdiction over a wide range of family matters, including child custody, support, and parental authority.
This one-stop family court model aims to:
No Direct Affect on U.S. Family Law
Family law in the United States is governed by the states, not the federal government. Quebec is a Canadian province, and as such, its laws have no binding authority in U.S. courts.
Furthermore, Quebec uses a mixed civil law system, while the U.S. is primarily common-law based. Most notably, however, Quebec’s UFT doesn’t include divorce jurisdiction, whereas U.S. family courts typically handle divorce alongside custody and support issues.
Where Influence Begins
It would be a mistake to completely dismiss the UFT as irrelevant. U.S. laws consistently evolve, and policymakers sometimes look to other countries for reform ideas. Many jurisdictions in this country have already experimented with the concept of “one family, one judge” systems. The UFT could reinforce interest in unified family courts in the U.S. and provide a real-world model for streamlining custody, support, and related disputes into one court to reduce conflicting orders and procedural inefficiencies.
In addition, Quebec’s emphasis on mandatory mediation (with safeguards for domestic violence cases) and early resolution may contribute to North American trends that are already moving away from adversarial family proceedings towards alternative dispute resolution.
The impact of the UFT is more tangible in international or interstate cases, such as:
In these areas, communication between courts may become more efficient due to centralized jurisdiction, simplifying the Canadian side of these disputes and making coordination easier.
However, the U.S. will continue to recognize established legal statutes, such as the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), and agreements, such as the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, for enforcement.
Rely on LPEP Law for Family Court Matters
Quebec’s UFT won’t change how a court will decide a custody case tomorrow. But it may influence how U.S. systems evolve and serve as a comparative model for reform. Its focus on efficiency, centralization, and mediation can serve as a blueprint for family courts where clarity and reduced conflict matter greatly.
If you’re facing a family law issue, you don’t have to navigate it alone. Our experienced legal team at Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri not only provides strategic guidance tailored to your situation but also stays closely attuned to evolving legal trends and potential reforms that could impact your case.
Contact us at 408-553-0801 to schedule a free consultation and take the first step toward resolving your case, backed by attorneys who stay ahead of the curve.
Disclaimer: this article does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.