• Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Vk
Call Us At: (408) 553-0801
Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri
  • Home
  • About
    • Why LPEP
    • Our Attorneys
    • Locations
      • San Jose
      • Santa Cruz
    • Testimonials
  • LPEP Spotlight
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Annulments
      • Certified Family Law Specialists
      • Child Custody and Visitation
      • Child Support
      • Divorce and Your Estate
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Divorce Planning
      • Domestic Partnerships
      • Domestic Violence
      • Enforcement and Modifications
      • Extramarital Affairs
      • Grandparents’ Rights
      • Harassment
      • Legal Separation
      • Mediation and Collaborative Divorce
      • Parental Relocations
      • Paternity
      • Postnuptial Agreements
      • Prenuptial Agreements
      • Property Division
      • Restraining Orders
      • Same Sex Divorce
      • Spousal Support and Alimony
    • Estate Planning
      • Business Succession Planning
      • Power of Attorney
      • Probate
      • Trust Administration
      • Trust and Probate Litigation
      • Trusts
      • Wills
  • FAQ
    • Estate Planning FAQ
    • Family Law FAQ
  • Blog
  • Pay Now
  • Resources
    • Family Law Resources
    • Estate Planning Resources
  • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Get a Free Consultation
  • Menu
Michael Lonich

Transmutation of Community Property for Estate Planning Purposes

November 13, 2009/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

Two recent California court decisions have held that once a spouse has transmuted his or her separate property into community property, then that property is permanently considered community property, regardless of explicit language in the transmutation agreement to the contrary.

In both Marriage of Holtemann and Marriage of Lund, a husband agreed to transmute his separate property into community property because he wanted his wife to have access to it in the event that he died before she did.  However when the parties divorced, the wife claimed that the husband’s separate property, pursuant to the agreement, was now community property.  In turn, the husband argued that the agreement effected a valid transmutation only for estate planning purposes, and therefore was not effective for dissolution purposes.

Both courts held that there is no such thing as a transmutation of property for estate planning purposes only, regardless of language in the agreement that purported to condition the transfer upon the death of either spouse.  Therefore, California courts have held that once separate property has been transmuted into community property, it is considered community property for all purposes, including dissolution.

Marriage of Holtemann (2008) 166 Cal. App. 4th 1166

A husband and wife entered into an agreement for the purpose of designating how their property was to be disposed of when they died.  Specifically, the agreement stated that the husband was transmuting his separate property into community property.  Although there was language in the agreement that alleged to have qualified or limited the transfer upon the death of either spouse, the appellant court held that the agreement effected a present transmutation of the husband’s separate property into community property.  However, the court did note that the husband still retained his right to seek reimbursement for his contribution of separate property to the community estate pursuant to California Family Code §2640(b).

Marriage of Lund (2009) 174 Cal. App. 4th 40

A husband and wife signed a written agreement that transmuted the husband’s separate real properties into community property.  The agreement further provided that it was a transfer of property only for estate planning purposes.  The appellate court held that a valid transmutation of the husband’s separate property had occurred.  The court reasoned that the husband had made an express declaration in writing of his unambiguous intention to transmute all of his separate property and therefore a valid transmutation had taken place notwithstanding the fact that the agreement did not use the word “transmutation.”  Thus, the court effectively held that there is no such thing as a transmutation for estate planning purposes only.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by Mail
https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Michael Lonich https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Michael Lonich2009-11-13 12:54:452021-12-22 22:05:33Transmutation of Community Property for Estate Planning Purposes
Learn more about estate planning with a free resource
Read all about family law and child custody
Learn more about family law matters such as private divorce counseling.

Categories

  • 2021
  • 2022
  • 2023
  • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Family Law
  • Firm News
  • In the Community
  • News
  • Personal
  • Probate
  • Spotlight

Posts From The Past 12 Months

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022

Explore Our Archives

Free 30-Minute Family Law or Estate Planning Consultation

1 + 6 = ?

Link to: Contact Us

Contact Us

LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI

1871 The Alameda, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95126
Phone: (408) 553-0801 | Fax: (408) 553-0807 | Email: contact@lpeplaw.com

Located in San Jose, Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri handles matters for clients in northern California, specifically San Jose and Silicon Valley. Our services are available to anyone within the following counties: Santa Clara, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Santa Cruz, Monterey, and San Benito. For a full listing of areas where we practice, please click here.

DISCLAIMER

This web site is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Nothing in the site is to be considered as either creating an attorney-client relationship between the reader and Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri or as rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. Readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information contained in Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri Web site without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.

About | Why LPEP | Contact | Blog

© 2023 Copyright Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy

Recent Developments Re: Domestic Violence Restraining Orders Child Custody Mediation: An Invaluable Process
Scroll to top

LPEP COVID-19 Office Protocol