Contact Us
LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI
1871 The Alameda, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95126
Phone: (408) 553-0801 | Fax: (408) 553-0807 | Email: contact@lpeplaw.com
LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI
Phone: (408) 553-0801
Fax: (408) 553-0807
Email: contact@lpeplaw.com
1871 The Alameda, Suite 400
San Jose, CA 95126
Located in San Jose, Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri handles matters for clients in northern California, specifically San Jose and Silicon Valley. Our services are available to anyone within the following counties: Santa Clara, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Benito, and San Francisco. For a full listing of areas where we practice, please click here.
MAKE A PAYMENT BY SCANNING THE QR CODE BELOW:
DISCLAIMER
This web site is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Nothing in the site is to be considered as either creating an attorney-client relationship between the reader and Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri or as rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. Readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information contained in Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri Web site without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.
© 2024 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
New Family Law Legislation Enacted in Response to a 2007 California Supreme Court Ruling
/in Family Law /by Gina PolicastriA recent legislative change affecting family law cases was brought about by the 2007 California Supreme Court ruling in Elkins v. Superior Court, which held that reducing live testimony in family law cases deprives parties of due process protection. In response to this ruling, the California legislature enacted a new law regarding the introduction of live testimony in family law cases. The new law was codified in §217 of the California Family Law Code.
Absent a stipulation of the parties or a finding of good cause, Section 217 requires that upon an order to show cause or notice of a motion, the court should receive any relevant “live, competent testimony” within the scope of any hearing. In addition, §217 authorizes the court to “ask questions of the parties.” The court “may make a finding of good cause to refuse to receive live testimony” in appropriate cases. In such cases, the court must state the reasons for its denial on the record or in writing. Section 217 also requires the Judicial Council to “adopt a statewide ruling of court regarding the factors a court shall consider in making a finding of good cause.”
Additionally, the new legislation requires that a party seeking to present live testimony from nonparty witnesses must “file and serve a witness list with a brief description of the anticipated testimony” prior to the date of the hearing. On request, the court may grant a brief continuance if the list is not served prior to the hearing.
As California family law is constantly changing, it is very important to consult a qualified family law attorney when encountering a divorce or child custody issues. For more information about California family law, please contact our attorneys at Lonich Patton Erlich Policastri for more information. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Source:
Cal. Family Law Monthly, Vol. 2010; No. 11.
Official California Legislative Information
New Federal Regulations Increase Hospital & Visitation Rights for Same-Sex Couples
/in Estate Planning /by Michael LonichEarlier this month, new federal regulations pertaining to hospital visitation became effective. These regulations require hospitals receiving federal Medicare or Medicaid money to have written visitation policies in place. The new law also requires hospitals to inform patients (or a patient’s representative) of their rights regarding visitors.
The new regulations require federally funded hospitals to allow patients to designate their own visitors. The new law also requires hospitals to allow patients the right to make personal decisions regarding whom they will appoint to make medical decisions on their behalf, regardless of gender or sexual identity. Hospitals refusing to comply with these new regulations will risk losing funding. These new regulations largely increase the rights of same-sex couples in relation to medical decisions.
If you live in California, and if you are interested in protecting your right to appoint a representative to make healthcare decisions during your incapacitation, you may be interested in learning more about an advanced healthcare directive or a durable power of attorney. An advance healthcare directive allows you to appoint a specified individual to make healthcare decisions based upon your specific wishes in the event you become incapacitated. A durable power of attorney allows your appointed agent to address your financial and property issues when you are unable to do so.
For more information on a durable power of attorney or an advanced health care directive, please contact us. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sources: The Huffington Post; The Columbia Dispatch
Florida Court Orders Chidi Ahanotu to Surrender His Half-Time Championship Ring in Divorce Case
/in Family Law /by Mitchell EhrlichUSA Today reports that a Florida divorce court recently ordered Chidi Ahanotu to handover the championship ring he won in 2002 while he was a defensive lineman for the St. Louis Rams. This decision has been viewed as unfair by some members of the public.
The court ordered Ahanotu to surrender the ring in order to pay the $130,000 he owes for his ex-wife’s legal fees. Ahanotu was not quiet about his view on the ruling: “This court system is a farce . . . This court wants a man to hand over his once-in-a-lifetime accomplishment to pay some damn attorney’s fees? I could see if it was going to pay something for my children or my ex-wife.”
It is important to remember that the law relating to divorce and legal procedures vary by state. In California, a trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether or not to award attorneys fees and costs in marital proceedings. The court’s decision will not be overruled on appeal unless there is a showing of an abuse of discretion. This means that the judge’s decision will remain intact on appeal unless it is shown that no judge could have reasonably decided to order (or deny) awarding attorneys fees and costs.
For more information about California’s divorce process, please contact our attorneys at Lonich Patton Erlich Policastri. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Source: USA Today
California Court Invalidates Dodger Owner’s Postnuptial Agreement
/in Family Law /by David PattonEarlier last month, a California court ruled that the postnuptial agreement entered into by Frank and Jamie McCourt, best known in their roles as owners of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team, was invalid. The invalid postnuptial agreement was alleged to have given Frank McCourt sole ownership of the LA Dodgers.
The court held that this agreement was invalid because when the contract was signed, there was not a mutual understanding between the parties regarding the contents of the agreement. The court supported its decision by noting that two conflicting versions of the postnuptial agreement were signed by the spouses, and both Frank McCourt and Jamie McCourt admitted they had not read the agreement.
For those individuals who are not familiar with the term “postnuptial agreement,” it is a contract that is entered into by married spouses during marriage. The agreement typically addresses issues relating to asset protection, debt division, and spousal support.
The fiduciary duty obligations that apply to the execution of a postnuptial agreement do not apply to the execution of a prenuptial agreement. Unlike a prenuptial agreement, which is executed prior to marriage, a postnuptial agreement must be executed within the parameters of the parties’ fiduciary obligations. Specifically, the California Family Law Code explains that spouses entering into postnuptial agreements must act with the “highest good faith and fair dealing” towards each other and must not “take any unfair advantage of the other.” Although the prospective spouses entering into a prenuptial agreement do not owe each other fiduciary obligations, many other requirements must be met in order for a prenuptial agreement to be enforceable.
This ruling serves to highlight the importance of selecting a qualified family law attorney who is experienced in drafting effective postnuptial and prenuptial agreements. For more information about these types of agreements, please contact the Family Law attorneys at Lonich Patton Erlich Policastri. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Source: ESPN
Four Tips for Ensuring Your Pet is Cared for After Your Death
/in Estate Planning /by Michael LonichSue Stevens, a financial planner and founder of Stevens Wealth Management, discusses estate planning for pets in her book, “Put Your Money Where Your Heart Is.” In the book, Stevens lays out four steps that anyone can take to protect their pet after they’re gone.
First, Stevens suggests that you choose a “pet guardian” and name this person in a trust. This should be the person that you want to care for your pets. In addition, make sure to name at least one back-up guardian in case your first choice is unable or unwilling to serve.
Second, decide how much money you want to set aside in a trust for your pet’s care. According to an American Pet Products Association survey, dogs generally cost around $1,400 per year while cats can cost approximately $1,000 per year. One of the best ways to ensure your pet is provided for is to set up a trust for your pet. The trustee of the pet trust does not have to be the same person that you choose as the pet’s caregiver (guardian).
Third, make sure to include provisions in your trust which provide for pet care. Specifically, the trust should include language that details how the money is to be spent (i.e. food, veterinary care, etc). Also, the trust should include a provision for interim care until your pet can be placed in a permanent home. An estate planning attorney can help you draft an effective trust for this purpose.
Lastly, leave written instructions for your pet’s caregiver (guardian). This information should include your pet’s medical record, feeding instructions, a list of favorite toys, and even the names of your pet’s human and furry friends. Please click here for the full article.
If you would like more information about how to plan for your dog or cat’s care after your passing, please contact our experienced Silicon Valley estate planning attorneys at Lonich Patton Erlich Policastri. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.