Blog
Free 30-Minute Family Law or Estate Planning Consultation
Contact Us
LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI
1871 The Alameda, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95126
Phone: (408) 553-0801 | Fax: (408) 553-0807 | Email: contact@lpeplaw.com
LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI
Phone: (408) 553-0801
Fax: (408) 553-0807
Email: contact@lpeplaw.com
1871 The Alameda, Suite 400
San Jose, CA 95126
Located in San Jose, Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri handles matters for clients in northern California, specifically San Jose and Silicon Valley. Our services are available to anyone within the following counties: Santa Clara, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Benito, and San Francisco. For a full listing of areas where we practice, please click here.
MAKE A PAYMENT BY SCANNING THE QR CODE BELOW:

DISCLAIMER
This web site is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Nothing in the site is to be considered as either creating an attorney-client relationship between the reader and Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri or as rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. Readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information contained in Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri Web site without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.
© 2024 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy

MARRIAGE, INC.: The Financial Partnership Between Spouses
/in Family Law /by Gina PolicastriWhen it comes to finances, California law treats spouses just like business partners. In fact, provisions of the California Corporations Code addressing the duties between business partners are incorporated right into the California Family Code. For example, Family Code 721(b), states that marriage is a “[confidential and fiduciary relationship] subject to the same rights and duties of nonmarital business partners” including an obligation between spouses to provide equal access to all information, records, and books that pertain to the value and character of those assets and debts. These duties and obligations exist between spouses while they are married and continue through the divorce proceedings and until the date on which all assets or liabilities are actually distributed. Further, these duties obligate both spouses to provide information even if the other spouse does not ask for it. Remedies for failure to abide by the disclosure requirements include attorney’s fees as well as an award to the other spouse of 100% of an asset that is undisclosed.
The Fourth Appellate District was recently called upon to visit these disclosure obligations in the case of Marriage of Feldman (2007) 153 Cal. App. 4th 1470. There, husband failed to disclose several financial transactions during the divorce proceedings, including the purchase of a home and $1 million bond, and the existence of a 401(k) and several other investments. Wife sought attorneys’ fees and sanctions and was awarded $140,000 in fees and sanctions in the amount of $250,000. The Appellate Court affirmed.
While the Feldman decision caught the attention of the family law bar and judges alike, this was not the first time a California court upheld a sanctions award based on the failure to disclose. In Marriage of Rossi (2001) 90 Cal. App. 4th 34, the Court of Appeal affirmed an award of 100% of $1.33 million in lottery winnings, which wife actively concealed during the proceedings, to Husband based on a finding that the concealment constituted fraud and came within the penalty provisions of the disclosure statutes.
The lesson to be learned by Feldman and Rossi is simple: disclose, disclose, disclose!
Announcement!
/in Family Law, Firm News /by Lonich Patton Ehrlich PolicastriGina N. Policastri is the newest member of the firm to pass the Family Law Legal Specialization exam in her quest to become certified as a Family Law Specialist* by the State Bar of California. In addition passing the written exam covering California Family Law, Gina must also:
Gina is currently working toward completing these rigorous requirements as part of the application process.
Join us in congratulating Gina in passing the written exam in her pursuit of excellence!
* Certified Family Law Specialist, The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
Five Common Myths about Estate Planning
/in Estate Planning /by Michael LonichMyth #1: Estate Planning is only for Wealthy Fat Cats!
Fact: The reality is that estate planning can be just as important for people of lower or middle income as it can be for wealthy people. Factors other than passing on great wealth to future generations affect the need for estate planning. One such factor is transferring ownership of property in accordance with your desires. If you don’t create a valid will, the state of California has a series of laws, known as intestate succession that will determine where your assets will go when you pass away. Rather than distributing your assets to the people you want, such laws may distribute your assets to family members you have not spoken to in years or possibly to distant relatives you have never even met. Another factor affecting the need for estate planning is providing future care for minor or disabled children. Estate planning allows you to name a guardian for your children if something should happen to you. Otherwise, a court will appoint a guardian, and it may not be an individual you would choose to raise your children. Also, proper advance planning can allow you to name someone to manage money that you leave to your minor children or designate exactly how you want to care for disabled children. Lastly, estate planning can provide you with a way of making health care and financial decisions for yourself in the event that you become incapacitated. With estate planning, you can have a health care power of attorney in place to enable someone that you trust to make health care decisions for you in the event that you become ill or are in an accident and cannot make decisions for yourself. Also, you could designate someone as a durable power of attorney to allow that person to manage your financial affairs if incapacitated.
Myth #2: In today’s world I can do my own estate plan, its easy!
Fact: Although estate planning do-it-yourself kits and software are available, they typically result in higher costs down the road for the friends and family you leave behind. For example, trusts drafted and administered through kits or from internet forms are a leading cause of trust and probate litigation. Spending the money now to secure good documents will save your family and friends a significant amount of money in the future by avoiding such costly litigation. Another issue that can arise with do-it-yourself methods is that each state has its own requirements for each of the various legal documents. So, if you create your own document and it doesn’t meet the specific requirements of the state in which you live, then your documents may not even be effective. In the end, spending money in the short run on an attorney who can guide and advise you in developing a sound estate plan can end up saving you and your loved ones a lot of money in the long run.
Myth #3: I already planned my estate, I have a will and that is the only estate planning document I need.
Facts: A will only comes into effect at death. As such, it does not help you manage your property in the event you become incapacitated. A well drafted trust has provisions for how your property should be managed in the event you cannot manage the property yourself. Also, dying with an outdated, incomplete or unsigned will can cause a number of problems for the loved ones that you leave behind. So, even if you have a will, or an entire estate plan already written out, it is important to review your documents every couple of years. In particular, it is important that you review your plan if any of the following events happen in your life: [1] the birth, death or disability of a child; [2] a change in marital status; [3] a significant change in the value or character of your financial assets; and/or [5] a change in state residence.
Myth #4: Who needs an estate plan when I can just hold all of my assets jointly with another person?
Fact: Although holding property in joint tenancy will avoid probate when you pass away, it is a terrible way to transfer property at death. When you add another person to your bank account or to your real estate as a joint tenant, you are exposing that asset to every current and future creditor of that new joint tenant. Therefore, if a parent puts a house in joint tenancy for a child, that house is subject to the child’s creditors and could be liquidated without the parent’s consent. Also, executing a deed is a present gift to the joint tenant. As a result, there may be significant gift tax consequences for that gift. Furthermore, although holding property in a joint tenancy will avoid probate upon your death, it merely delays probate until the last joint tenant’s death. Finally, unlike an estate plan which can be set up to be fully amendable and revocable, a gift of property into joint tenancy is not revocable without the cooperation of the donee. Thus, if you have a falling out with the joint tenant you cannot just simply take back the property.
Myth #5: All trusts avoid estate tax.
Fact: Everything a person owns and controls at death will be included in his or her taxable estate. This includes assets that pass under a will or revocable trust, assets held in joint tenancy with others, life insurance, retirement accounts, etc. Nonetheless, once the value of the taxable estate has been determined, there are deductions, exemptions and exclusions to apply which may reduce or eliminate any estate tax liability. Additionally, property in a revocable trust, also known as a “living trust,” may be subject to estate tax. However, property in an irrevocable trust is generally not subject to estate tax because it cannot be modified by you, the trustor.
Do I Need a Pre-Nup?
/in Family Law /by Julia LemonAs wedding season approaches, you may be wondering whether a pre-nup, or pre-marital agreement, is necessary or right for you. A pre-marital agreement can provide many benefits, such as protecting your separate property, supporting your estate plan, and establishing rules for deciding future matters during marriage and handling issues such as spousal support and property division should you later divorce.
When considering whether a pre-marital agreement is right for you and your fiancé, consider the following questions. If you and/or your fiancé answers yes to any of the following questions, you may benefit from a pre-marital agreement.
If you would like to discuss the benefits and procedural requirements of a pre-marital agreement, please contact Lonich & Patton, LLP for a free 30 minute consultation. Consider issues that you may want to address in your pre-marital agreement, such as separate property identification, decisions about how you will handle money and property while you are married, whether spousal support (alimony) will be paid or waived in the event of divorce, retirement benefit agreements, and agreements about how you want to leave property at your death.
Source: http://family.findlaw.com/marriage/marriage-agreements/prenup-decision.html
The Elkins Family Law Task Force
/in Family Law /by Gina PolicastriThe Elkins Family Law Task Force was appointed in response to an August 2007 California Supreme Court opinion, Elkins v. Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1337, which held that marital dissolution trials should “proceed under the same general rules of procedure that govern other civil trials.” The charge of the task force is to propose measures to improve efficiency and fairness in family law proceedings and ensure access to justice for all family law litigants. At its initial meeting in June 2008, the task force defined values that have guided its work and will inform proposed recommendations:
Ensuring justice, fairness, and due process in family law;
Ensuring meaningful access for all litigants;
Using innovative techniques to promote effectiveness and efficiency;
Improving the status of, and respect for, family law litigants and the family law process and
Securing adequate resources, including existing, reallocated, and new resources.
As of October 1, 2009 the Elkins Family Law Task Force had released over 100 draft recommendations for a two-month public comment period that ended on December 4, 2009. The task force will convene in a two-day meeting from February 1-2, 2010 in the Judicial Council Conference Center of the Administrative Office of the Courts in San Francisco.
Adapted from http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/jc/tflists/elkins.htm