• Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Vk
Call Us At: (408) 553-0801
Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri
  • Home
  • About
    • Why LPEP
    • Our Attorneys
    • Locations
      • San Jose
      • Santa Cruz
      • San Francisco
    • Testimonials
  • LPEP Spotlight
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Annulments
      • Certified Family Law Specialists
      • Child Custody and Visitation
      • Child Support
      • Divorce and Your Estate
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Divorce Planning
      • Domestic Partnerships
      • Domestic Violence
      • Enforcement and Modifications
      • Extramarital Affairs
      • Grandparents’ Rights
      • Harassment
      • Legal Separation
      • Mediation and Collaborative Divorce
      • Parental Relocations
      • Paternity
      • Postnuptial Agreements
      • Prenuptial Agreements
      • Property Division
      • Restraining Orders
      • Same Sex Divorce
      • Spousal Support and Alimony
    • Estate Planning
      • Business Succession Planning
      • Power of Attorney
      • Probate
      • Trust Administration
      • Trust and Probate Litigation
      • Trusts
      • Wills
  • FAQ
    • Estate Planning FAQ
    • Family Law FAQ
  • Blog
  • Pay Now
  • Resources
    • Family Law Resources
    • Family Law Terms
    • Estate Planning Resources
  • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Get a Free Consultation
  • Menu

Do I Need a Pre-Nup?

January 25, 2010/in Family Law /by Julia Lemon

As wedding season approaches, you may be wondering whether a pre-nup, or pre-marital agreement, is necessary or right for you.   A pre-marital agreement can provide many benefits, such as protecting your separate property, supporting your estate plan, and establishing rules for deciding future matters during marriage and handling issues such as spousal support and property division should you later divorce.

When considering whether a pre-marital agreement is right for you and your fiancé, consider the following questions.  If you and/or your fiancé answers yes to any of the following questions, you may benefit from a pre-marital agreement.

  • Do you own any real estate?
  • Do you own more than $50,000 worth of assets other than real estate?
  • Do you own all or part of a business?
  • Do you currently earn a salary of more than $100,000 per year?
  • Have you earned more than one year’s worth of retirement benefits or do you have other valuable employment benefits, such as profit sharing or stock options?
  • Does one of you plan to pursue an advanced degree while the other works?
  • Will all or part of your estate go to someone other than your spouse?

If you would like to discuss the benefits and procedural requirements of a pre-marital agreement, please contact Lonich & Patton, LLP for a free 30 minute consultation.  Consider issues that you may want to address in your pre-marital agreement, such as separate property identification, decisions about how you will handle money and property while you are married, whether spousal support (alimony) will be paid or waived in the event of divorce, retirement benefit agreements, and agreements about how you want to leave property at your death.

Source: http://family.findlaw.com/marriage/marriage-agreements/prenup-decision.html

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Julia Lemon https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Julia Lemon2010-01-25 13:12:072021-12-22 22:04:10Do I Need a Pre-Nup?

The Elkins Family Law Task Force

January 20, 2010/in Family Law /by Gina Policastri

The Elkins Family Law Task Force was appointed in response to an August 2007 California Supreme Court opinion, Elkins v. Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1337, which held that marital dissolution trials should “proceed under the same general rules of procedure that govern other civil trials.”  The charge of the task force is to propose measures to improve efficiency and fairness in family law proceedings and ensure access to justice for all family law litigants.  At its initial meeting in June 2008, the task force defined values that have guided its work and will inform proposed recommendations:

Ensuring justice, fairness, and due process in family law;

Ensuring meaningful access for all litigants;

Using innovative techniques to promote effectiveness and efficiency;

Improving the status of, and respect for, family law litigants and the family law process and

Securing adequate resources, including existing, reallocated, and new resources.

As of October 1, 2009 the Elkins Family Law Task Force had released over 100 draft recommendations for a two-month public comment period that ended on December 4, 2009.  The task force will convene in a two-day meeting from February 1-2, 2010 in the Judicial Council Conference Center of the Administrative Office of the Courts in San Francisco.

Adapted from http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/jc/tflists/elkins.htm

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Gina Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Gina Policastri2010-01-20 13:26:052021-12-22 22:04:15The Elkins Family Law Task Force

Commonly Used Terms in Family Law

January 11, 2010/in Family Law /by Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

Child Support – Money paid by a parent to help support a child or children.

Spousal Support-the money paid to the divorced spouse or to the spouse with whom divorces proceedings are initiated, as compensation ordered by the court, for their support. In no-fault divorce it is also called as alimony.

Child Custody– used in the court of law in cases where the court has to decide on which parents, in case of divorce cases, and who be the guardian in any other case, of a child who is not yet 18 years of age regarding the social upbringing, education and health matters. The court has to make a decision on such cases very carefully as its a question of child’s future and present upbringing. Incase its found that both the parents are unfit of not of sound mind, the custody of the child goes relatives and orphanages.

Arrears – Money owed because a parent or spouse did not make a court ordered child or spousal support payment on time.

Prenuptial Agreement –  a written contract between two people who are about to marry, setting out the terms of possession of assets, treatment of future earnings, control of the property of each, and potential division if the marriage is later dissolved. These agreements are fairly common if either or both parties have substantial assets, children from a prior marriage, potential inheritances, high incomes, or have been “taken” by a previous spouse.

Postnuptial Agreement – a voluntary marriage contract between spouses that is created after their wedding. It is important that each party has their own legal counsel before signing a postnuptial agreement.

Qualified Domestic Relations Order – Any decree, judgment, or order that recognizes the right of one person (the alternate payee) to participate either totally or partially in the pension of another (the participant). The alternate payee must be a dependent child, spouse, or former spouse of the participant. This is an exception to the ERISA rule, proscribing the assignment of plan benefits. Abbreviated QDRO.

With help from the following sources:

http://www.legal-explanations.com

http://www.yourdictionary.com/law/qualified-domestic-relations-order

http://marriage.about.com/od/agreements/g/postnuptial.htm

http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1585

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri2010-01-11 13:18:002021-12-22 22:04:35Commonly Used Terms in Family Law

Commonly Used Terms In Divorce Proceedings

December 18, 2009/in Family Law /by Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

Divorce – A common name for a marriage that is legally ended.

Mediation – When a neutral person (called a mediator) helps people who cannot agree to communicate so they can reach a settlement they both accept. A mediator does NOT give legal advice.

Mediator – Mediators are lawyers or professionals trained to solve disputes. They are neutral and help people settle on their own. The mediator does not decide the case.

Collaborative Law – A way to solve conflicts without going to court. Both sides have a lawyer, but they agree not to go to court unless it is impossible to settle.

Mandatory Settlement Conference – This is the last chance for people in a lawsuit to try to settle before trial. A judge or lawyer listens to both sides of the case and tries to find a solution that everyone agrees with. It is less formal than a full Settlement Conference.

Pro Tempore – Same as a pro tem, or temporary judge. A referee, commissioner, or lawyer who temporarily replaces a judge. Comes from the Latin for for the time being or temporarily.

Default – When a defendant doesn’t file an answer in time or go to court when s/he is supposed to. If the defendant was properly notified, the judge can decide the case without him or her.

Proceedings – Usually, the process of conducting judicial business in front of a court or other judicial officer. A proceeding is any of the separate steps in that process, like, a motion or hearing.

Order to show cause – A court order that makes someone go to court to explain to the judge why s/he did not follow the rules. If someone doesn’t follow the rules, the judge can fine or punish that person in other ways.

Petitioner – A person who presents a petition to the court.

Respondent – The person who answers the original Petition.

With help from the Superior Court of California, County  of Santa Clara website.

http://www.scselfservice.org/fam/default.htm

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri2009-12-18 13:04:462021-12-22 22:04:53Commonly Used Terms In Divorce Proceedings

Text Messaging During a Divorce

December 11, 2009/in Family Law /by Julia Lemon

As a recent article points out, text messages, along with other types of electronic media, are frequently coming into play and presenting new concerns for those in the midst of a divorce proceeding.  Text messages sent to a spouse, friend, or new partner during a divorce proceeding often “reveal intentions, intimate details and negotiation strategies” and may be subpoenaed and recovered during the proceeding, even if deleted from your phone after sending.  Accordingly, take care when text messaging, emailing, or using other social networking sites during a divorce proceeding to avoid unintended consequences.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS187839+03-Nov-2009+PRN20091103

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Julia Lemon https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Julia Lemon2009-12-11 12:31:452021-12-22 22:05:00Text Messaging During a Divorce

Child Custody Mediation: An Invaluable Process

November 16, 2009/in Family Law /by Mitchell Ehrlich

If you have minor children and you separate or seek a divorce from your child’s parent, you will need to decide who will have custody of your children and how they will be taken care of. Although there are specific legal definitions, in short “Custody” means:

Who your child will live with and where (“physical custody”)

Who will make important “legal custody” decisions for your children (health care, education, other important decisions) and how.

All together, this is often called a “parenting plan.”

Your Parenting Plan

You need a parenting plan that is in the best interest of your child.

For “Physical custody,” which means time with the children, think about activities, overnights, and day-to-day care:

Where should my child be during the week? On weekends?

Where should my child be for holidays, summer vacations, and special days?

Which parent will be in charge of which activities (sports, music, homework)?

Which parent is in charge at which times?

How will my child get from one parent to the other (Transportation/pick ups   and drop offs)?  Who will pay the costs?

For “Legal custody,” which means making decisions about the children, be clear and specific about which decisions each parent can make on their own and which decisions you will make together:

Things such as Schools, Daycare, Religion, Medical and dental care

When and Why Mediation?

If you and the other parent are not able to informally reach a parenting plan, per California Family Code Section 3170, the court will order you and the other parent to meet with a professional child mediator before you can appear before a judge and have the court render a decision regarding custody.

The goals of mediation are to:

Help you and the other parent make a parenting plan that’s in the best interest of your children;

Help you and the other parent make a parenting plan that lets your children spend time with both parents, assuming it is safe and healthy to do so;

Avoid expensive, lengthy and emotionally taxing custody litigation.

What Happens in Mediation

Mediation involves both parents and a professional mediator. Attorneys rarely attend.  Mediation is a way to make decisions about your children without the time, expense and emotional cost of contested, litigated custody “battle” in court. You and the other parent keep control over the outcome by making your own agreement for how you will take care of your children, instead of leaving it up to a judge to make the decision for you. The legal term for this agreement is “stipulation.” It is also called a “parenting plan” or a “parenting agreement.”

What do mediators do?

Although most child custody mediators are experienced in family and marriage counseling, mediation is not counseling. A mediator meets with both parents and works with them to try to agree on a plan that is best for their child. In fact they are duty bound per Family Code Section 3180 which provides that the mediator has the duty to assess the needs and interests of the child involved in the controversy, and shall use his or her best efforts to effect a settlement of the custody or visitation dispute that is in the best interest of the child.

Guidelines for mediation:

Treat each other with respect. You will both get a chance to explain your ideas.

Listen to each other and try to find real solutions.

Put the children first. Think about what they need and can handle.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is what I say in mediation confidential?

In some counties such as Santa Clara County, Lonich Patton Erlich Policastri’s main county of practice, what you say is completely confidential. The other party can’t use it in court in any way. This is pursuant to Family Code Section 3177 which provides that Mediation proceedings pursuant to this chapter shall be held in private and shall be confidential.  All communications, verbal or written, from the parties to the mediator made in the proceeding are official information within the meaning of Section 1040 of the Evidence Code.

In other counties, such as Santa Cruz and Alameda Counties, mediators make “recommendations” to the judge when the parents don’t reach an agreement in mediation. What you say in mediation can be reported to the judge and to the other parent and his or her attorney – but it’s confidential as far as anyone else goes.

What happens if we can’t agree on everything in mediation?

The failure to reach an agreement on every single issue does not mean that the mediation was unsuccessful. Even if you can only agree on vacations and holidays, or perhaps a temporary schedule for the next six months, you still have achieved success. In these instances, though, what happens after mediation (if there is not a full agreement) depends on the court.

What if the other parent and I cannot agree on anything?

Mediation can still be a valuable tool. For example, even if you can’t agree on a parenting plan, you may be able to narrow the scope of the dispute with an idea of what the other parent’s main areas of concerns are. For example, if you are a working parent and the other is not, they may be concerned about your parenting ability or experience. Or perhaps you have concerns about the other parent’s ability to control their anger.

By learning of these concerns in mediation, even in the absence of an agreement, perhaps the parties can take parenting classes or anger management counseling that will placate the others parent’s concerns.

Should I meet with my lawyer prior to Mediation:  Yes.

While mediation is not intended to be an adversarial process, preparation with your attorney is invaluable and will lead to greater success. Your lawyer can help explain the process and educate you on the issues that should be addressed during the mediation. A good attorney can also assist you in how to communicate your concerns and how to ensure that you have sufficient time.

Will my lawyer look at my parenting plan before I go to court?

Yes. Your lawyer should go over this agreement (also called a “custody and visitation agreement”) before it becomes a permanent child custody order.

Good luck with your parenting plan.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Mitchell Ehrlich https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Mitchell Ehrlich2009-11-16 14:27:522021-12-22 22:05:22Child Custody Mediation: An Invaluable Process

Recent Developments Re: Domestic Violence Restraining Orders

November 13, 2009/in Family Law /by Julia Lemon

In the recent case of In re Marriage of Nadkarni (173 Cal. App. 4th 1483), Husband accessed Wife’s private email account during a custody proceeding to find out information about her whereabouts; he then attached emails to pleadings filed with the court and alleged that he obtained other information that was inflammatory and sensitive that he planned to use in future litigation.  Wife filed a request for a Domestic Violence Temporary Restraining Order under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA), asserting that Husband had improperly accessed her private email account without her authorization and was threatening to use inflammatory material to detrimentally affect her business relationships and embarrass her in court.  She also alleged that Husband used information from her email account to monitor her social calendar, and that his knowledge of her activities, coupled with his history of spousal abuse, made her fear for her safety.  While the trial court initially granted a Temporary Restraining Order, it subsequently determined that Husband’s conduct did not rise to the level necessary for an extended DVPA restraining order and dismissed her application.

On appeal, the court determined that a restraining order could be issued to prevent someone from, among other things, stalking, threatening, harassing, making annoying phone calls, or disturbing the peace of the person making the application or his or her family members; violent conduct or actual physical harm is not necessarily required.  It then defined “disturbing the peace” to include “conduct that destroys the mental or emotional calm of the other party.”  Therefore, the court reasoned that Husband could certainly have disturbed Wife’s mental and emotional calm by accessing her email account, reading her emails, and publicizing their contents, and her application sufficiently alleged conduct that could be threatening and injurious to her mental and emotional well-being.  Therefore, the trial court should have held a hearing on the issue.

This case is important because it clarifies that the statutes pertaining to domestic violence should be interpreted broadly and that the court should focus on the big picture and the context of victimizers’ acts when addressing domestic violence related matters to ensure that they are handled fairly and appropriately.

Excerpted from California Family Law Report July 2009 at http://www.cflr.com/com/2009_07.php

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Julia Lemon https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Julia Lemon2009-11-13 12:52:592021-12-22 22:05:38Recent Developments Re: Domestic Violence Restraining Orders

Mitch Gets Certified

October 30, 2009/in Family Law, Firm News /by Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

We are pleased to announce that Partner Mitchell T. Ehrlich has become a Certified Family Law Specialist as certified by The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization . This is a distinction that reflects a very high level of proficiency in a specialized field.  To attain this level Mr. Ehrlich had to complete the following;

  1. Take and pass a written examination in Family Law
  2. Demonstrate a high level of experience in Family Law
  3. Fulfill strenuous ongoing educational requirements
  4. Be favorably evaluated by other attorneys and Judges familiar with his or her work in the field

We here at Lonich & Patton, LLP, are proud of Mitchell’s accomplishment.  Family Law is a complex area of practice which requires both a superior knowledge of the law but also familiarity with the local judges and courts to achieve the best results for our clients. Certified specialists are the elite among the Family Law Bar and Mr. Ehrlich’s leadership ranks him at the top of his field. We are happy to have him join Mr. Patton and as a Certified Specialist.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri2009-10-30 16:59:402021-12-22 22:05:57Mitch Gets Certified
Page 34 of 34«‹323334
Learn more about estate planning with a free resource
Read all about family law and child custody
Learn more about family law matters such as private divorce counseling.

Categories

  • 2021
  • 2022
  • 2023
  • 2024
  • 2025
  • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Family Law
  • Firm News
  • In the Community
  • News
  • Personal
  • Probate
  • Spotlight

Posts From The Past 12 Months

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024

Explore Our Archives

Free 30-Minute Family Law or Estate Planning Consultation

0 + 2 = ?

Contact Us

LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI

1871 The Alameda, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95126
Phone: (408) 553-0801 | Fax: (408) 553-0807 | Email: contact@lpeplaw.com

LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI

Phone: (408) 553-0801
Fax: (408) 553-0807
Email: contact@lpeplaw.com

1871 The Alameda, Suite 400
San Jose, CA 95126

Located in San Jose, Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri handles matters for clients in northern California, specifically San Jose and Silicon Valley. Our services are available to anyone within the following counties: Santa Clara, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Benito, and San Francisco. For a full listing of areas where we practice, please click here.

MAKE A PAYMENT BY SCANNING THE QR CODE BELOW:

DISCLAIMER

This web site is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Nothing in the site is to be considered as either creating an attorney-client relationship between the reader and Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri or as rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. Readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information contained in Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri Web site without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.

About | Why LPEP | Contact | Blog

© 2024 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy

Scroll to top

LPEP COVID-19 Office Protocol