• Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Vk
Call Us At: (408) 553-0801
Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri
  • Home
  • About
    • Why LPEP
    • Our Attorneys
    • Locations
      • San Jose
      • Santa Cruz
      • San Francisco
    • Testimonials
  • LPEP Spotlight
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Annulments
      • Certified Family Law Specialists
      • Child Custody and Visitation
      • Child Support
      • Divorce and Your Estate
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Divorce Planning
      • Domestic Partnerships
      • Domestic Violence
      • Enforcement and Modifications
      • Extramarital Affairs
      • Grandparents’ Rights
      • Harassment
      • Legal Separation
      • Mediation and Collaborative Divorce
      • Parental Relocations
      • Paternity
      • Postnuptial Agreements
      • Prenuptial Agreements
      • Property Division
      • Restraining Orders
      • Same Sex Divorce
      • Spousal Support and Alimony
    • Estate Planning
      • Business Succession Planning
      • Power of Attorney
      • Probate
      • Trust Administration
      • Trust and Probate Litigation
      • Trusts
      • Wills
    • Family Law Mediation
    • Professional Athletes
  • FAQ
    • Estate Planning FAQ
    • Family Law FAQ
  • Blog
  • Pay Now
  • Resources
    • Family Law Resources
    • Family Law Terms
    • Estate Planning Resources
  • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Get a Free Consultation
  • Menu

Divorcing Couple War Over Child’s Religion

March 24, 2010/in Family Law /by Julia Lemon

Recently, a Chicago father has been in the news for violating a custody order by taking his daughter to a Catholic mass. Specifically, Father converted to Judaism after marrying Mother, and allegedly agreed to raise their daughter Jewish. However, they soon separated, and Father began practicing Catholicism again and even had their daughter baptized Catholic. Thereafter, in the midst of a bitter custody battle, the court issued an order that Father could not expose his daughter to any religion other than Judaism. Father allegedly violated that order by taking his daughter to a Catholic mass and Mother filed a contempt motion; the issue is still pending.

In California, when adjudicating custody, courts cannot base a custody or visitation decision on one parent’s religious practices without a clear showing that the religious practices are detrimental to the child. Generally speaking, each parent is entitled to religious freedom with regard to his or her child and may decide what he or she believes is in the child’s best interests. In fact, addressing religious issues during a custody/visitation dispute raises serious First Amendment concerns regarding the freedom of religion, so most courts attempt to steer clear of these issues. Courts will only intervene when the parent seeking to limit the other from exposing or practicing another religion demonstrates that the belief or practice actually presents a substantial threat of harm to the child.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Julia Lemon https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Julia Lemon2010-03-24 15:18:542021-12-22 22:02:28Divorcing Couple War Over Child's Religion

Spousal Support is Not Always Deductible When Liability Extended Beyond Death

March 10, 2010/in Family Law /by Mitchell Ehrlich

Husband and Wife entered into a Marital Settlement Agreement predicated upon their ultimate judgments of divorce.  If the couple were to enter into a divorce, the provisions of the agreement would be fully incorporated into the final divorce judgment.

The agreement included two provisions regarding their respective rights upon death of the other party with respect to the property of the other.  This included an interest in past, present and future spousal support obligations accepting any obligations set forth in the agreement itself.

The agreement provided that it was binding and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their heirs except as specifically excluded by the agreement.  Any terms not met would be an obligation of the decedent spouse’s estate.

The agreement obligated the husband to provide a sizeable sum in escrow to his wife upon the entry of a divorce judgment.  This amount would be used to purchase a condominium for her prior to the divorce; the unused balance of the escrow account was to be paid to the wife after the divorce was final.  The agreement also obligated the husband to pay the condominium fees prior to the final divorce judgment.

The agreement also required the husband to pay the wife’s attorney’s fees up to a set amount.

The husband paid as mandated by the agreement and attempted to deduct it as spousal support.  The IRS disallowed the deduction and found that the Marital Settlement Agreement which had been fully incorporated at that point into the final divorce judgment did not support his claim that it was spousal support giving him the benefit of the deduction for those sums paid.  The IRS further found that the agreement, by its terms, caused the escrow account to be an obligation account that would not cease upon the death of the wife and as such was disallowed.  Spousal support cannot continue after the death of either spouse as a matter of law.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Mitchell Ehrlich https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Mitchell Ehrlich2010-03-10 13:32:542021-12-22 22:02:45Spousal Support is Not Always Deductible When Liability Extended Beyond Death

Lump Sum Payment Allowed as Alimony/Spousal Support Deduction

March 3, 2010/in Family Law /by David Patton

Wife and Husband filed for dissolution of their marriage a couple years back.  Prior to their final judgment of divorce, the couple reached an agreement for a lump sum spousal support payment.  Marital Settlement Agreement called for a payment of approximately $150,000 and the final judgment incorporating the Marital Settlement Agreement was issued by the court.

The final Judgment was entered several months later and indicated that Husband had paid the lump sum spousal support by certified check.  The final Judgment stipulated a much larger number as the total lump sum spousal support payment with the following adjustments:

  • Reduction for a distribution to the wife of Husband’s half of the proceeds from the sale of their home
  • An addition for personal property distribution to the wife
  • An addition for the wife’s payment of a personal debt of the husband
  • A reduction for Husband’s payment of joint debt
  • A reduction for Husband’s assumption of one of Wife’s debts
  • A reduction for a transfer of Husband’s investment account.

The couple filed a joint return for the prior year reflecting deductions for the year in which the lump sum, with adjustments, spousal support payment was made.  The IRS initially disallowed the entire amount claimed and ultimately agreed to the lump sum spousal support payment as the only one that was properly deductible; the balance of the payments redistributing the couple’s debt and assets were disallowed by the IRS.

Frequently in dissolution settlement a lump sum spousal support buyout includes a number of features that are nothing more than settlement of personal property (to include cash assets such as industrial accounts and the like) and real property and as such would not be deductible as spousal support.  It is also typical that a spousal support buyout be treated as a non taxable event such that the payor does not get the typical spousal support deduction for the amount paid and the receiving spouse does not have to pay tax as it is described as a property division or settlement.  In that case the agreement itself dictates that the payment would not be a deductible for the payor nor would it be income for the payee.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 David Patton https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png David Patton2010-03-03 13:25:402021-12-22 22:03:04Lump Sum Payment Allowed as Alimony/Spousal Support Deduction

It’s Tax Time: Income Tax Considerations During a Divorce

March 1, 2010/in Family Law /by Gina Policastri

If you are in the middle of a divorce proceeding, you may be wondering how you should file your tax return, whether you can claim the children as dependency exemptions and how to determine whether support payments should be deducted or included as income.  The following brief, non-exhaustive summary will help you navigate these issues so that you are well-prepared for your tax appointment.  However, given the complexity of tax laws, it is always a good idea to speak with legal and tax professionals who can analyze your specific situation.

What is my Filing Status?

When deciding how to file, remember that your filing status is determined by your marital status on the last day of the calendar year.  For example, if you filed for dissolution on June 30, 2009, but did not obtain a judgment of dissolution until January 1, 2010, you cannot file as a single person on your 2009 income taxes.

If you are still married, you and your spouse must decide whether you will file your returns jointly (“married filed jointly”) or separately (“married filing separately”).  Generally, the high earner gets a benefit from filing a joint return, however, with a joint return comes joint and several liability, meaning that both spouses are liable for any taxes owed, regardless of who earned the income.   Except in certain limited circumstances, you cannot amend a married filing jointly return to a married filing separate return, so if you have any doubts about how to file, you should err on the side of caution and file married filing separate.

Who Gets to Claim the Kids?

If filing separate returns, you must determine who will claim the children as dependents.  The general rule is that the primary custodial parent will take the exemption, but that parent can release the exemption to the other.  For tax purposes, the primary custodial parent is the one with at least 51% custody.  It is therefore important when entering into a joint 50/50 custody agreement to include a provision that for tax purposes, one of the parties will be deemed to have 51% custody.  When there are two children, you can each take 51% custody of one child and share the deductions.  If there is only one child, you can alternate 51% custody on a yearly basis.   If this is not spelled out in your custody order, the IRS will give the deduction to whoever had the child at least 51% of the year, so parents should keep good records of their actual time with the child(ren) in the event there is a dispute over who is entitled to take the deductions.

Can I Deduct Support I Paid/Is Support I Received Taxable Income?

Another common question is whether support paid or received should be deducted from income of the payor and included in the payee’s income.  The general rule is that the payee’s gross income does not include amounts received for child support, but does include money received for spousal support/alimony.  Similarly, a payor cannot deduct child support payments, but can deduct spousal support payments, which are an “above the line” deduction.  To be deemed spousal support, payments must meet numerous IRS requirements, including, but not limited to, that the payments be made in cash by or on behalf of a spouse under a written divorce or separation agreement or decree.  There are also special rules relating to spousal support and equalization payments made as part of a property settlement; if not properly structured, a payor can lose the right to deduct all spousal support payments made under the agreement.  The IRS rules related to “front loading” are beyond the scope of this article, but should be discussed with a legal and tax professional so that you can structure a settlement that does not trigger this issue.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Gina Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Gina Policastri2010-03-01 13:09:192021-12-22 22:03:13It’s Tax Time: Income Tax Considerations During a Divorce

Property Division in Divorce

February 17, 2010/in Family Law /by Julia Lemon

Dividing up personal property during a divorce can be difficult, as different items may be especially unique or useful or may have sentimental value to one or both spouses.  Celebrity Kate Walsh and her husband, Alex Young, devised an ingenious scheme to ensure that each received an equal share of the community furniture and artwork and each received items important to him or her.  They agreed that each would take turns picking items, with the “winner” of a coin toss having the right to pick first.

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20342085,00.html?xid=rss-topheadlines&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+people%2Fheadlines+%28PEOPLE.com%3A+Top+Headlines%29&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Julia Lemon https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Julia Lemon2010-02-17 13:08:482021-12-22 22:03:29Property Division in Divorce

MARRIAGE, INC.: The Financial Partnership Between Spouses

February 8, 2010/in Family Law /by Gina Policastri

When it comes to finances, California law treats spouses just like business partners.  In fact, provisions of the California Corporations Code addressing the duties between business partners are incorporated right into the California Family Code.  For example, Family Code 721(b), states that marriage is a “[confidential and fiduciary relationship] subject to the same rights and duties of nonmarital business partners” including an obligation between spouses to provide equal access to all information, records, and books that pertain to the value and character of those assets and debts.  These duties and obligations exist between spouses while they are married and continue through the divorce proceedings and until the date on which all assets or liabilities are actually distributed.  Further, these duties obligate both spouses to provide information even if the other spouse does not ask for it.  Remedies for failure to abide by the disclosure requirements include attorney’s fees as well as an award to the other spouse of 100% of an asset that is undisclosed.

The Fourth Appellate District was recently called upon to visit these disclosure obligations in the case of Marriage of Feldman (2007) 153 Cal. App. 4th 1470.  There, husband failed to disclose several financial transactions during the divorce proceedings, including the purchase of a home and $1 million bond, and the existence of a 401(k) and several other investments.  Wife sought attorneys’ fees and sanctions and was awarded $140,000 in fees and sanctions in the amount of $250,000.  The Appellate Court affirmed.

While the Feldman decision caught the attention of the family law bar and judges alike, this was not the first time a California court upheld a sanctions award based on the failure to disclose.  In Marriage of Rossi (2001) 90 Cal. App. 4th 34, the Court of Appeal affirmed an award of 100% of $1.33 million in lottery winnings, which wife actively concealed during the proceedings, to Husband based on a finding that the concealment constituted fraud and came within the penalty provisions of the disclosure statutes.

The lesson to be learned by Feldman and Rossi is simple:  disclose, disclose, disclose!

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Gina Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Gina Policastri2010-02-08 13:44:242021-12-22 22:03:44MARRIAGE, INC.: The Financial Partnership Between Spouses

Announcement!

February 1, 2010/in Family Law, Firm News /by Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

Gina N. Policastri is the newest member of the firm to pass the Family Law Legal Specialization exam in her quest to become certified as a Family Law Specialist* by the State Bar of California. In addition passing the written exam covering California Family Law, Gina must also:

  • Have substantial litigation experience in the field of Family Law
  • Complete State Bar approved legal education requirements applicable to the family law field; and
  • Be favorably evaluated by judges and other attorneys concerning her knowledge, ability and experience in the practice of Family Law

Gina is currently working toward completing these rigorous requirements as part of the application process.

Join us in congratulating Gina in passing the written exam in her pursuit of excellence!

* Certified Family Law Specialist, The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri2010-02-01 14:12:522021-12-22 22:03:53Announcement!

Do I Need a Pre-Nup?

January 25, 2010/in Family Law /by Julia Lemon

As wedding season approaches, you may be wondering whether a pre-nup, or pre-marital agreement, is necessary or right for you.   A pre-marital agreement can provide many benefits, such as protecting your separate property, supporting your estate plan, and establishing rules for deciding future matters during marriage and handling issues such as spousal support and property division should you later divorce.

When considering whether a pre-marital agreement is right for you and your fiancé, consider the following questions.  If you and/or your fiancé answers yes to any of the following questions, you may benefit from a pre-marital agreement.

  • Do you own any real estate?
  • Do you own more than $50,000 worth of assets other than real estate?
  • Do you own all or part of a business?
  • Do you currently earn a salary of more than $100,000 per year?
  • Have you earned more than one year’s worth of retirement benefits or do you have other valuable employment benefits, such as profit sharing or stock options?
  • Does one of you plan to pursue an advanced degree while the other works?
  • Will all or part of your estate go to someone other than your spouse?

If you would like to discuss the benefits and procedural requirements of a pre-marital agreement, please contact Lonich & Patton, LLP for a free 30 minute consultation.  Consider issues that you may want to address in your pre-marital agreement, such as separate property identification, decisions about how you will handle money and property while you are married, whether spousal support (alimony) will be paid or waived in the event of divorce, retirement benefit agreements, and agreements about how you want to leave property at your death.

Source: http://family.findlaw.com/marriage/marriage-agreements/prenup-decision.html

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Julia Lemon https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Julia Lemon2010-01-25 13:12:072021-12-22 22:04:10Do I Need a Pre-Nup?

The Elkins Family Law Task Force

January 20, 2010/in Family Law /by Gina Policastri

The Elkins Family Law Task Force was appointed in response to an August 2007 California Supreme Court opinion, Elkins v. Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1337, which held that marital dissolution trials should “proceed under the same general rules of procedure that govern other civil trials.”  The charge of the task force is to propose measures to improve efficiency and fairness in family law proceedings and ensure access to justice for all family law litigants.  At its initial meeting in June 2008, the task force defined values that have guided its work and will inform proposed recommendations:

Ensuring justice, fairness, and due process in family law;

Ensuring meaningful access for all litigants;

Using innovative techniques to promote effectiveness and efficiency;

Improving the status of, and respect for, family law litigants and the family law process and

Securing adequate resources, including existing, reallocated, and new resources.

As of October 1, 2009 the Elkins Family Law Task Force had released over 100 draft recommendations for a two-month public comment period that ended on December 4, 2009.  The task force will convene in a two-day meeting from February 1-2, 2010 in the Judicial Council Conference Center of the Administrative Office of the Courts in San Francisco.

Adapted from http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/jc/tflists/elkins.htm

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Gina Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Gina Policastri2010-01-20 13:26:052021-12-22 22:04:15The Elkins Family Law Task Force

Commonly Used Terms in Family Law

January 11, 2010/in Family Law /by Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

Child Support – Money paid by a parent to help support a child or children.

Spousal Support-the money paid to the divorced spouse or to the spouse with whom divorces proceedings are initiated, as compensation ordered by the court, for their support. In no-fault divorce it is also called as alimony.

Child Custody– used in the court of law in cases where the court has to decide on which parents, in case of divorce cases, and who be the guardian in any other case, of a child who is not yet 18 years of age regarding the social upbringing, education and health matters. The court has to make a decision on such cases very carefully as its a question of child’s future and present upbringing. Incase its found that both the parents are unfit of not of sound mind, the custody of the child goes relatives and orphanages.

Arrears – Money owed because a parent or spouse did not make a court ordered child or spousal support payment on time.

Prenuptial Agreement –  a written contract between two people who are about to marry, setting out the terms of possession of assets, treatment of future earnings, control of the property of each, and potential division if the marriage is later dissolved. These agreements are fairly common if either or both parties have substantial assets, children from a prior marriage, potential inheritances, high incomes, or have been “taken” by a previous spouse.

Postnuptial Agreement – a voluntary marriage contract between spouses that is created after their wedding. It is important that each party has their own legal counsel before signing a postnuptial agreement.

Qualified Domestic Relations Order – Any decree, judgment, or order that recognizes the right of one person (the alternate payee) to participate either totally or partially in the pension of another (the participant). The alternate payee must be a dependent child, spouse, or former spouse of the participant. This is an exception to the ERISA rule, proscribing the assignment of plan benefits. Abbreviated QDRO.

With help from the following sources:

http://www.legal-explanations.com

http://www.yourdictionary.com/law/qualified-domestic-relations-order

http://marriage.about.com/od/agreements/g/postnuptial.htm

http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1585

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri2010-01-11 13:18:002021-12-22 22:04:35Commonly Used Terms in Family Law
Page 35 of 36«‹33343536›
Learn more about estate planning with a free resource
Read all about family law and child custody
Learn more about family law matters such as private divorce counseling.

Categories

  • 2021
  • 2022
  • 2023
  • 2024
  • 2025
  • 2026
  • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Family Law
  • Firm News
  • In the Community
  • News
  • Personal
  • Probate
  • Spotlight

Posts From The Past 12 Months

  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025

Explore Our Archives

Free 30-Minute Family Law or Estate Planning Consultation

0 + 8 = ?

Contact Us

LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI

1871 The Alameda, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95126
Phone: (408) 553-0801 | Fax: (408) 553-0807 | Email: contact@lpeplaw.com

LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI

Phone: (408) 553-0801
Fax: (408) 553-0807
Email: contact@lpeplaw.com

1871 The Alameda, Suite 400
San Jose, CA 95126

Located in San Jose, Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri handles matters for clients in northern California, specifically San Jose and Silicon Valley. Our services are available to anyone within the following counties: Santa Clara, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Benito, and San Francisco. For a full listing of areas where we practice, please click here.

MAKE A PAYMENT BY SCANNING THE QR CODE BELOW:

DISCLAIMER

This web site is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Nothing in the site is to be considered as either creating an attorney-client relationship between the reader and Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri or as rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. Readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information contained in Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri Web site without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.

About | Why LPEP | Contact | Blog | Data Breach Information

© 2024 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy

Scroll to top

LPEP COVID-19 Office Protocol