• Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Vk
Call Us At: (408) 553-0801
Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri
  • Home
  • About
    • Why LPEP
    • Our Attorneys
    • Locations
      • San Jose
      • Santa Cruz
      • San Francisco
    • Testimonials
  • LPEP Spotlight
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Annulments
      • Certified Family Law Specialists
      • Child Custody and Visitation
      • Child Support
      • Divorce and Your Estate
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Divorce Planning
      • Domestic Partnerships
      • Domestic Violence
      • Enforcement and Modifications
      • Extramarital Affairs
      • Grandparents’ Rights
      • Harassment
      • Legal Separation
      • Mediation and Collaborative Divorce
      • Parental Relocations
      • Paternity
      • Postnuptial Agreements
      • Prenuptial Agreements
      • Property Division
      • Restraining Orders
      • Same Sex Divorce
      • Spousal Support and Alimony
    • Estate Planning
      • Business Succession Planning
      • Power of Attorney
      • Probate
      • Trust Administration
      • Trust and Probate Litigation
      • Trusts
      • Wills
  • FAQ
    • Estate Planning FAQ
    • Family Law FAQ
  • Blog
  • Pay Now
  • Resources
    • Family Law Resources
    • Family Law Terms
    • Estate Planning Resources
  • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Get a Free Consultation
  • Menu

Is the Price Right?

April 7, 2010/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

Buy/Sell Agreements and Estate Planning

Generally, for a buy/sell agreement to establish the value of a business interest for estate planning purposes it must:

1. Be a bona fide business arrangement;
2. Not be a device for transferring the business to family members at a discounted value;
3. Have terms comparable to similar, arms length agreements;
4. Fix a purchase price that is reasonable when the agreement is executed; and outline a pricing formula to consider evaluation changes in the intervening years;
5. Require an owner’s estate or beneficiaries to sell the shares at a specified price; and
6. Restrict owners’ disposition of their interests during life and at death.

If at least 50% of a company’s value is owned by non-family members subject to the same terms as family members, a buy/sell agreement is presumed to meet these requirements.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Michael Lonich https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Michael Lonich2010-04-07 13:39:532021-12-22 22:01:47Is the Price Right?

2010: The Year of No Estate Tax

April 5, 2010/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

The Economic Growth and Tax Reconciliation Act of 2001 eliminated estate taxes for 2010, though they will return with a vengeance in 2011. (The maximum rate, previously 45% with an exemption of 3.5 million, rises to 55% next year with an exemption of just 1 million.) Although many expect Congress to retroactively apply estate taxes for this year, others are calling 2010 the “throw mama from the train” year. Adding an element of suspense is a push in Congress to make permanent the previous $3.5 million exemption. California’s estate lawyers are awaiting the outcome of HR4154. Even if Congress extends the 2009 exemption going forward there were many plans written with the current code in mind and once a permanent decision is made many plans will need rewriting.

Many observers doubt the HR4154 will pass unless it includes a provision to “reunify” gift and estate taxes which were split into different rates in 2001. That, in turn, could mean a two or three year boom in tax and estate law as gift givers scramble to take advantage of the shift.

With all of the changes happening recently as well as potential changes yet to be decided, many estate plans could have holes and will probably have some issues once the law is changed. If it ends up being no estate tax in 2010, it will make for an interesting year.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Michael Lonich https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Michael Lonich2010-04-05 10:23:202021-12-22 22:02:032010: The Year of No Estate Tax

Study Shows Value of Living Will

April 2, 2010/in Estate Planning /by Gina Policastri

A new study suggests that more than one in four of the elderly population will need someone to make their end-of-life decisions for them. This finding places a significant emphasis on the importance of creating a living will and stating after-life wishes explicitly. A living will is a statement that is written by the patient that explains their choices for treatment if he/she becomes incapacitated. Researchers also stated that someone must be designated to make the treatment decisions for the patients. The results of a recent study concluded that those who explicitly stated their end-of-life wishes in a living will were more likely to get the treatment that they wanted. In 2009, the end-of-life care topic became a part of the health care reform debate. During the debate, the legislation proposed that if they were given a provision, Medicare would be allowed to pay doctors in order to counsel patients about end-of-life decisions. This idea got denied because critics thought end-of-life counseling was similar to a death panel.
The study also showed that due to dementia, a stroke, or a debilitating illness, the elderly are unable to make their own decisions near the end of life.

(This study included 3,746 people who were 60 and over. They passed away between the years of 2000 to 2006. )

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Gina Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Gina Policastri2010-04-02 11:59:002021-12-22 22:02:09Study Shows Value of Living Will

Inherited IRA’s and Management in Your Living Trust or Marital Trust

March 8, 2010/1 Comment/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

A husband and wife developed an estate plan that included a trust which was subdivided into Trust A, Trust B and Trust C.  Trust A would contain the survivor’s separate and community property (Survivor’s trust).  Trust B would contain the balance of the decedent’s estate (Decedent’s Trust).  And Trust C (Marital Trust) allowed the surviving spouse to fund it with property or cash.

The husband died, he and his wife were residents of a community property estate at the time of his death.  Prior to his death the husband had transferred two of his IRA accounts into one combined IRA and made the family’s revocable trust the primary beneficiary of his IRA.

Upon the husband’s death the wife has the power to amend, revoke, or terminate Trust A and as sole beneficiary of that Survivor Trust she will receive income and can take the corpus out at any time.

However, she cannot amend, revoke or terminate the Decedent (Trust B) or Marital (Trust C) Trust.  She has the right to receive income or corpus from the trust as needed for her support, health, maintenance and education.

Under the foregoing scenario the survivor and successor trustee, the wife, could have the IRA distributed to Trust A, then withdraw the funds, and move the amount into an IRA in her own name.  As such she may be treated as the payee or distributee of the IRA, the IRA would not be treated as an inherited IRA and she is eligible to move over the distribution to set up an IRA account in her own name.  Considering the foregoing she would not have to report the IRA distribution as income if properly moved over.

This is an example of a significant benefit in utilizing a family or revocable living trust for purposes of managing retirement assets after the death of the first spouse.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Michael Lonich https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Michael Lonich2010-03-08 13:10:582021-12-22 22:02:54Inherited IRA’s and Management in Your Living Trust or Marital Trust

Five Common Myths about Estate Planning

January 27, 2010/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

Myth #1: Estate Planning is only for Wealthy Fat Cats!

Fact: The reality is that estate planning can be just as important for people of lower or middle income as it can be for wealthy people.  Factors other than passing on great wealth to future generations affect the need for estate planning.  One such factor is transferring ownership of property in accordance with your desires.  If you don’t create a valid will, the state of California has a series of laws, known as intestate succession that will determine where your assets will go when you pass away.  Rather than distributing your assets to the people you want, such laws may distribute your assets to family members you have not spoken to in years or possibly to distant relatives you have never even met.  Another factor affecting the need for estate planning is providing future care for minor or disabled children.  Estate planning allows you to name a guardian for your children if something should happen to you.  Otherwise, a court will appoint a guardian, and it may not be an individual you would choose to raise your children.  Also, proper advance planning can allow you to name someone to manage money that you leave to your minor children or designate exactly how you want to care for disabled children.  Lastly, estate planning can provide you with a way of making health care and financial decisions for yourself in the event that you become incapacitated.  With estate planning, you can have a health care power of attorney in place to enable someone that you trust to make health care decisions for you in the event that you become ill or are in an accident and cannot make decisions for yourself.  Also, you could designate someone as a durable power of attorney to allow that person to manage your financial affairs if incapacitated.

Myth #2: In today’s world I can do my own estate plan, its easy!

Fact: Although estate planning do-it-yourself kits and software are available, they typically result in higher costs down the road for the friends and family you leave behind.  For example, trusts drafted and administered through kits or from internet forms are a leading cause of trust and probate litigation.  Spending the money now to secure good documents will save your family and friends a significant amount of money in the future by avoiding such costly litigation.  Another issue that can arise with do-it-yourself methods is that each state has its own requirements for each of the various legal documents.  So, if you create your own document and it doesn’t meet the specific requirements of the state in which you live, then your documents may not even be effective.  In the end, spending money in the short run on an attorney who can guide and advise you in developing a sound estate plan can end up saving you and your loved ones a lot of money in the long run.

Myth #3: I already planned my estate, I have a will and that is the only estate planning document I need.

Facts: A will only comes into effect at death.  As such, it does not help you manage your property in the event you become incapacitated.  A well drafted trust has provisions for how your property should be managed in the event you cannot manage the property yourself.  Also, dying with an outdated, incomplete or unsigned will can cause a number of problems for the loved ones that you leave behind.  So, even if you have a will, or an entire estate plan already written out, it is important to review your documents every couple of years.  In particular, it is important that you review your plan if any of the following events happen in your life: [1] the birth, death or disability of a child; [2] a change in marital status; [3] a significant change in the value or character of your financial assets; and/or [5] a change in state residence.

Myth #4: Who needs an estate plan when I can just hold all of my assets jointly with another person?

Fact: Although holding property in joint tenancy will avoid probate when you pass away, it is a terrible way to transfer property at death.  When you add another person to your bank account or to your real estate as a joint tenant, you are exposing that asset to every current and future creditor of that new joint tenant.  Therefore, if a parent puts a house in joint tenancy for a child, that house is subject to the child’s creditors and could be liquidated without the parent’s consent.   Also, executing a deed is a present gift to the joint tenant.  As a result, there may be significant gift tax consequences for that gift.  Furthermore, although holding property in a joint tenancy will avoid probate upon your death, it merely delays probate until the last joint tenant’s death.  Finally, unlike an estate plan which can be set up to be fully amendable and revocable, a gift of property into joint tenancy is not revocable without the cooperation of the donee.  Thus, if you have a falling out with the joint tenant you cannot just simply take back the property.

Myth #5: All trusts avoid estate tax.

Fact: Everything a person owns and controls at death will be included in his or her taxable estate.  This includes assets that pass under a will or revocable trust, assets held in joint tenancy with others, life insurance, retirement accounts, etc.  Nonetheless, once the value of the taxable estate has been determined, there are deductions, exemptions and exclusions to apply which may reduce or eliminate any estate tax liability.  Additionally, property in a revocable trust, also known as a “living trust,” may be subject to estate tax.  However, property in an irrevocable trust is generally not subject to estate tax because it cannot be modified by you, the trustor.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Michael Lonich https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Michael Lonich2010-01-27 13:31:422021-12-22 22:04:03Five Common Myths about Estate Planning

Commonly Used Terms in Probate and Estate Planning

January 6, 2010/in Business Law, Estate Planning /by Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

Beneficiary – Someone who gets something from a trust. A person who gets money from a trust is called an income beneficiary. A person who gets property from a trust is called a remainder beneficiary.

Will – A legal paper that says what a person wants to happen to his or her personal property after s/he dies.  The person who controls the Will can change or cancel it at any time before they die.

Probate Estate – All the assets in an estate that are subject to probate. This does not include all property. For example, property in joint tenancy, or an IRA account are not part of the probate estate.

Conservatorship – A court proceeding where a judge picks someone (a conservator) to take care of an adult’s personal needs (Conservatorship of the person) and/or his or her finances (Conservatorship of the estate).

Guardianship – A court proceeding where a judge chooses someone to care for a person under age 18 or to manage his or her property, or both. Guardianship of the person gives someone who is not the child’s parent custody and control of the child. Guardianship of the estate gives someone (parent or not) the right to manage the minor’s property until the child is 18.

Trust – A trust is when one person (trustee) holds title to property for the benefit of another person (the beneficiary). A person called the settlor (or trustor) creates the trust and puts the property in the trust. The settlor, trustee, and beneficiary can be different people. But, one single person could be the settlor, trustee and beneficiary.

Joint Tenancy – When 2 or more people own something and have rights of survivorship. This means that if 1 tenant dies, his or her share goes to the other tenants.

Totten Trust Account – A type of savings or checking account. The money that’s left in the account when the owner dies goes to the person the owner chose. It is not subject to probate. The same as P.O.D. (payable on death) accounts. P.O.D. accounts are more common.

Litigation – A case, or lawsuit. The people in a lawsuit cannot agree, so they present evidence and let the court decide.

Will Contest – When you challenge the validity of a Will in probate court. You can challenge a Will because: it was not executed properly; it was cancelled or revoked; the testator was not capable of writing it.

Executor – The person or company named in a Will to carry out the Will’s instructions. Usually, the probate court supervises the executor.

Letters Testamentary – Court papers that let someone be the personal representative of a probate estate.

Fiduciary – A person who acts for another person’s benefit, like a trustee, guardian, or personal representative. It also means something that is based on a trust or confidence.

Intestate – To die without a valid Will. Or, a person who dies without a Will.

Intestate Succession – State laws that say who gets a person’s property when s/he dies without a Will. Or, what happens if the Will does not say what to do with the property.

With help from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara website.

http://www.scselfservice.org/probate/prop/FrequentlyAskedQuestions2.htm

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri2010-01-06 13:15:262021-12-22 22:04:43Commonly Used Terms in Probate and Estate Planning

What is involved in estate planning?

December 4, 2009/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

There are many issues to consider in creating an estate plan. To begin with you should, ask yourself the following questions:

  • What are my assets and what is their approximate value?
  • Whom do I want to receive those assets and when?
  • Who should manage those assets if I cannot, either during my lifetime or after my death?
  • Who should be responsible for taking care of my minor children if I become unable to care for them myself?
  • Who should make decisions on my behalf concerning my care and welfare if I become unable to care for myself?
  • What do I want done with my remains after I die and where would I want them buried, scattered or otherwise laid to rest?

Once you have some answers to these questions, you are ready to seek the advice and services of a qualified lawyer. The attorneys at Lonich Patton Erlich Policastri can help you create an estate plan, and advise you on such issues as title to assets and the management of your estate.

Courtesy of the State Bar of California

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Michael Lonich https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Michael Lonich2009-12-04 13:54:422021-12-22 22:05:08What is involved in estate planning?

Transmutation of Community Property for Estate Planning Purposes

November 13, 2009/in Estate Planning /by Michael Lonich

Two recent California court decisions have held that once a spouse has transmuted his or her separate property into community property, then that property is permanently considered community property, regardless of explicit language in the transmutation agreement to the contrary.

In both Marriage of Holtemann and Marriage of Lund, a husband agreed to transmute his separate property into community property because he wanted his wife to have access to it in the event that he died before she did.  However when the parties divorced, the wife claimed that the husband’s separate property, pursuant to the agreement, was now community property.  In turn, the husband argued that the agreement effected a valid transmutation only for estate planning purposes, and therefore was not effective for dissolution purposes.

Both courts held that there is no such thing as a transmutation of property for estate planning purposes only, regardless of language in the agreement that purported to condition the transfer upon the death of either spouse.  Therefore, California courts have held that once separate property has been transmuted into community property, it is considered community property for all purposes, including dissolution.

Marriage of Holtemann (2008) 166 Cal. App. 4th 1166

A husband and wife entered into an agreement for the purpose of designating how their property was to be disposed of when they died.  Specifically, the agreement stated that the husband was transmuting his separate property into community property.  Although there was language in the agreement that alleged to have qualified or limited the transfer upon the death of either spouse, the appellant court held that the agreement effected a present transmutation of the husband’s separate property into community property.  However, the court did note that the husband still retained his right to seek reimbursement for his contribution of separate property to the community estate pursuant to California Family Code §2640(b).

Marriage of Lund (2009) 174 Cal. App. 4th 40

A husband and wife signed a written agreement that transmuted the husband’s separate real properties into community property.  The agreement further provided that it was a transfer of property only for estate planning purposes.  The appellate court held that a valid transmutation of the husband’s separate property had occurred.  The court reasoned that the husband had made an express declaration in writing of his unambiguous intention to transmute all of his separate property and therefore a valid transmutation had taken place notwithstanding the fact that the agreement did not use the word “transmutation.”  Thus, the court effectively held that there is no such thing as a transmutation for estate planning purposes only.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 Michael Lonich https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png Michael Lonich2009-11-13 12:54:452021-12-22 22:05:33Transmutation of Community Property for Estate Planning Purposes

10 Tips for choosing a Guardian

November 3, 2009/in Estate Planning /by David Patton

Choosing a guardian for your children is one of the most important estate planning decisions you and your spouse can make. Without a guardian, the court will choose one for you if you and your spouse die unexpectedly. This is a big motive for you to choose and have the say in who will care for your children should the unexpected happen. These are 10 tips to help you make an important decision.

1. Take inventory. Form a list of potential guardians. These can be a number of different people that don’t just have to be family members.

2. Make value judgments. Consider the values that you and your spouse share and ask yourselves which guardians share them as well. You might not find a perfect match so be sure to pick the most important values.

3. Consider the intangibles. Intangible qualities are a big part of a potential guardian. Is this person a “good match”? Do they have the patience and maturity? Are they loving?

4. Consider age. Factor in the age of your guardian to your children. Grandparents may not be the perfect match for the energetic four year old.

5. Be practical. Be sure to pick a guardian that can support your children. Make sure they can accommodate them at their house and take notice of their location.

6. Don’t dismiss the possibility of separate guardians. If the children are from different marriages, are far apart in age, or have special needs, consider separate guardians that might serve them better.

7. Talk it over. Narrow down your choices and choose a first choice with some alternatives. Talk with them about your decision and make sure that person is on the same page as you with becoming your children’s guardian.

8. Put it in writing. Be sure to put the guardian or co-guardians in writing in your will. In this stage you can also exclude potential guardians, name alternate guardians, and the person who will attain the role of guardian in the case of divorce.

9. Choose a temporary guardian. You should also consider choosing a temporary guardian that can take care of your children in the event that you are unable to do so (for medical reasons, for example). This could be the same or a different guardian as your permanent decision.

10. Be flexible. Be sure to check back on your guardian decision as your children get older because what might be a good fit today may not be 10 years from now.

We would be more than happy to help with your guardianship or any other estate planning needs. Fell free to contact us or comment with questions.

Courtesy of The Estate Planner, Triplett Services, LLC, May/June 2009 issue.

10 Tips for choosing a Guardian

Choosing a guardian for your children is one of the most important estate planning decisions you and your spouse can make. Without a guardian, the court will choose one for you if you and your spouse die unexpectedly. This is a big motive for you to choose and have the say in who will care for your children should the unexpected happen. These are 10 tips to help you make an important decision.

  1. Take inventory. Form a list of potential guardians. These can be a number of different people that don’t just have to be family members.

  1. Make value judgments. Consider the values that you and your spouse share and ask yourselves which guardians share them as well. You might not find a perfect match so be sure to pick the most important values.

  1. Consider the intangibles. Intangible qualities are a big part of a potential guardian. Is this person a “good match”? Do they have the patience and maturity? Are they loving?

  1. Consider age. Factor in the age of your guardian to your children. Grandparents may not be the perfect match for the energetic four year old.

  1. Be practical. Be sure to pick a guardian that can support your children. Make sure they can accommodate them at their house and take notice of their location.

  1. Don’t dismiss the possibility of separate guardians. If the children are from different marriages, are far apart in age, or have special needs, consider separate guardians that might serve them better.

  1. Talk it over. Narrow down your choices and choose a first choice with some alternatives. Talk with them about your decision and make sure that person is on the same page as you with becoming your children’s guardian.

  1. Put it in writing. Be sure to put the guardian or co-guardians in writing in your will. In this stage you can also exclude potential guardians, name alternate guardians, and the person who will attain the role of guardian in the case of divorce.

  1. Choose a temporary guardian. You should also consider choosing a temporary guardian that can take care of your children in the event that you are unable to do so (for medical reasons, for example). This could be the same or a different guardian as your permanent decision.

  1. Be flexible. Be sure to check back on your guardian decision as your children get older because what might be a good fit today may not be 10 years from now.

We would be more than happy to help with your guardianship or any other estate planning needs. Fell free to contact us or comment with questions.

Courtesy of The Estate Planner, Triplett Services, LLC, May/June 2009 issue.

https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png 0 0 David Patton https://www.lpeplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/LPEP_PC.png David Patton2009-11-03 17:29:312021-12-22 22:05:4910 Tips for choosing a Guardian
Page 20 of 20«‹181920
Learn more about estate planning with a free resource
Read all about family law and child custody
Learn more about family law matters such as private divorce counseling.

Categories

  • 2021
  • 2022
  • 2023
  • 2024
  • 2025
  • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Family Law
  • Firm News
  • In the Community
  • News
  • Personal
  • Probate
  • Spotlight

Posts From The Past 12 Months

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024

Explore Our Archives

Free 30-Minute Family Law or Estate Planning Consultation

6 + 2 = ?

Contact Us

LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI

1871 The Alameda, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95126
Phone: (408) 553-0801 | Fax: (408) 553-0807 | Email: contact@lpeplaw.com

LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI

Phone: (408) 553-0801
Fax: (408) 553-0807
Email: contact@lpeplaw.com

1871 The Alameda, Suite 400
San Jose, CA 95126

Located in San Jose, Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri handles matters for clients in northern California, specifically San Jose and Silicon Valley. Our services are available to anyone within the following counties: Santa Clara, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Benito, and San Francisco. For a full listing of areas where we practice, please click here.

MAKE A PAYMENT BY SCANNING THE QR CODE BELOW:

DISCLAIMER

This web site is intended for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Nothing in the site is to be considered as either creating an attorney-client relationship between the reader and Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri or as rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. Readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information contained in Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri Web site without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.

About | Why LPEP | Contact | Blog

© 2024 Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy

Scroll to top

LPEP COVID-19 Office Protocol