annulment Archives - Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

What’s the Difference Between An Annulment And A Divorce?

January 27, 2021/0 Comments/in Family Law /by Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

Relationships are complicated, which explains why so many people are afraid of marriage. It’s a big decision and it can be difficult if one party decides they want out of the marriage. If you did enter into a marriage, and you or your partner have realized you want out, you have options. There’s divorce, annulment, and in some cases, legal separation. But what’s the difference between an annulment and a divorce? How do you know which is right for you and your spouse?

What’s An Annulment?

Many people recognize the term annulment from silly sitcoms about last-minute Las Vegas weddings that the co-stars don’t remember the next morning. In reality, annulments are a very useful, very valid tool that serves a much more serious purpose. An annulment doesn’t just end a marriage, it completely nullifies it. If you get an annulment, it cancels a marriage out and acts as though the marriage never happened or existed. It allows for both parties to remarry post annulment. It’s a clean slate.

Not everyone can get an annulment, however. There are rules that dictate which couples are eligible. For example, if one spouse lies or withholds information from their spouse upon marriage, the other spouse can file for an annulment based on misrepresentation. Some other reasons for an annulment include:

If one party was presently married to another at the time of the wedding. This is also known as bigamy.
If one or both spouses were underage at the time of the marriage.
If one spouse was forced or coerced into the marriage.
If the spouse(s) were mentally ill or unwell at the time of the marriage.
If one or both parties were on drugs or alcohol, thus impairing their judgment, at the time of the wedding.
If the relationship between the parties is incestuous and therefore illegal by law.
Impotency in a spouse or inability to perform sexually can also result in an annulment.

You can get help understanding these rules and stipulations by hiring an experienced annulment attorney. It can be hard to navigate an annulment on your own, so, having an expert can be beneficial.

What’s A Divorce?

A divorce is a legal dissolution of a marriage. It goes a step further than legal separation and has stricter requirements. In California, parties must have lived in the state for at least 6 months before they can get a divorce. Couples can choose legal separation over divorce.

A person returns a ring to their ex spouse after learning what's the difference between an annulment and a divorce

Like an annulment, ex-spouses can remarry after a divorce. However, unlike an annulment, the divorce isn’t wiped from the record. A divorce means the marriage still existed and you must go through the procedures of dividing up property and assets and determining alimony and child support payments. California is a no-fault divorce state, which means that neither spouse is blamed for the end of the marriage. This usually follows with assets being divided 50/50. Spouses may need to obtain legal representation to help ensure the assets are divided equitably rather than equally.

If you have questions about whether or not you are eligible for an annulment or a divorce, or are still curious what’s the difference between an annulment and a divorce, contact an experienced annulment attorney. Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri has over 100 collective years of experience in family law. Set up a free 30-minute consultation here to find out if you and your spouse are eligible for an annulment.

The Upcoming W.N.B.A. Battle: Setting Precedent for Same-Sex Couples with Children

July 1, 2015/0 Comments/in Family Law /by Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

W.N.B.A. players Brittney Griner, last season’s defensive player of the year, and Glory Johnson, two-time All-Star, had a controversial relationship leading up to their marriage on May 8, 2015. Even more provocative are the actions taken by Ms. Griner a month after the couple was married and a day after Glory Johnson announced her pregnancy.

On April 22, 2015, the couple was arrested following a domestic disturbance at their home. As a result of the fight, Ms. Griner received a bite wound on her finger and scrapes on her wrist, and Ms. Johnson received a cut above her lip and a concussion. Ms. Griner pleaded guilty to misdemeanor disorderly conduct, while Ms. Johnson pleaded not guilty and her case was dismissed.

At a time of increased scrutiny of domestic violence and athletes, the league suspended both players for seven out of their thirty-four game season— the longest in league history. According to Laurel J. Richie, president of the W.N.B.A., “The W.N.B.A. takes all acts of violence extremely seriously. It is our strong belief that violence has absolutely no place in society, in sports or in this league. As president, it is my reasonability to protect the league and uphold its values. Our athletes represent the W.N.B.A., and they all must abide by the league’s standards of conduct. In this case, Brittney and Glory failed to do so, and that is unacceptable.”

Despite these troubles, the couple proceeded to marry. However, only 28 days later, Ms. Griner filed for an annulment. Ms. Griner made the following statement, “I can confirm that today [June 5^th] I filed for an annulment. In the week prior to the wedding, I attempted to postpone the wedding several times until I completed counseling, but I still went through with it. I now realize that was a mistake.” In response, Ms. Johnson’s agent, D.J. Fisher, stated that Ms. Johnson “loves Brittney and made a huge sacrifice to carry a child, put her career on hold, invest in their relationship and their future.”

It is anticipated that the couple will be heading for a battle as they have vastly conflicting opinions of Ms. Johnson’s impending motherhood. Ms. Griner claims that she does not even know when Ms. Johnson became pregnant and she has no biological connection to the baby. Ms. Johnson claims that Ms. Griner was a “willing participant, consenting and signing all the necessary documents” for the in vitro fertilization.

The law has been changing in regards to same-sex couples, most recently with the United States Supreme Court finding that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage. Courts have been trying to navigate the waters in terms of the rights and privileges of same-sex couples. In recent years, there have also been developments relating to their child support obligations.

Courts have asserted a number of bases for “an obligation on the part of the parent’s former same-sex partner to provide financial support for the child,” including a finding of an obligation based at least in part on a contract or promise. In Karin T. v. Michael T., the parties had two children by means of artificial insemination. Before this procedure, “the partner executed an agreement stating[:] ‘a. That such child or children so produced are his own legitimate child or children and are the heirs of his body, and b. That he hereby completely waives forever any right which he might have to disclaim such child or children as his own.’” Additionally, the parties had lived together in the same household for six years and both contributed to the support of the family and the children. The court found under these circumstances and the provisions of the agreement between the parties there was an enforceable contract. The court stressed that “the document that was signed by the partner, by which these children were brought into the world, gave rise to a situation that needed to provide these two children with remedies.” To hold otherwise, the court stated, would allow the partner to escape her responsibilities in supporting the children.

As the law continues to shift in regards to same-sex marriages, the very public Griner-Johnson separation will likely bring attention to child support obligations of same-sex partners. If Ms. Griner “fights paying child support, it could set a precedent in the state for same-sex couples.” As Arizona lawyer Claudia D. Work stated, “This is going to come down to whether the court will hold Ms. Griner to contractual promises.”

If you have any questions about same-sex marriage or any other issue, the Certified Family Law Specialists at Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri have decades of experience handling complex family law matters. Please contact the Certified Family Law Specialists at Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri for further information. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Source: Julie A. Nice, Symposium, The Descent of Responsible Procreation: A Genealogy of an Ideology, 45 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 781, 798 (2012).

Source: Child Support Obligations of Former Same-Sex Partners, 5 A.L.R.6th 303 (Originally published in 2005).

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/sports/basketball/wnba-suspends-brittney-griner-and-glory-johnson-in-domestic-violence-case.html?_r=0

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/05/wnba-brittney-griner-annul-marriage_n_7523708.html

Source: http://www.bostonherald.com/inside_track/celebrity_news/2015/06/wnba_war_the_day_after_glory_johnson_reveals_shes_pregnant

Annulment: Cleaning the Marital Slate

February 15, 2013/0 Comments/in Family Law /by Gina Policastri

Whether or not we care to admit it, Kim Kardashian remains in the spotlight. Consequently, so do her legal troubles. Kardashian and Kris Humphries were famously married in August 2011. Their nuptials allegedly cost $11 million and the wedding itself was televised as a special on the E! Television network. After 72 days of marital bliss, Kardashian filed for divorce in October 2011.

Although the couple split almost two years ago, Kardashian and Humphries remain legally married. Their divorce has never been finalized because Humphries is seeking an annulment. Humphries believes that Kardashian fraudulently lured him into marriage for financial gain as Kardashian reportedly made $1 million from the wedding. Humphries claims she had planned to take the money and run. Kardashian, of course, claims that she married for love.

In the eyes of the law, a successful annulment makes a marriage disappear as if it never happened.* There is a fundamental difference between a judgment of dissolution and a judgment of nullity. While a judgment of dissolution terminates a valid marriage, a judgment of nullity declares that the marriage was invalid from the start. In California, a marriage built upon a fraudulent foundation is not a marriage at all. An annulment is, however, much more difficult to attain than a divorce.

According to California Family Code Section 2210, a marriage that is voidable may be declared a “nullity” only in the event at least one of six specific conditions existed at the time of marriage:

Infancy
Bigamy
Unsound Mental State
Fraud
Force
Physical Incapability

The certified Family Law Specialists as certified by The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization at Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri have decades of experience handling complex family law matters. If you find yourself on either side of an annulment, contact Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri for further information.

Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may detail general legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Is a Divorce Right for You?

February 15, 2011/0 Comments/in Family Law /by Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri

If you are currently living in northern California and are contemplating ending your marriage through a divorce, here is some basic information on what a divorce entails. A “divorce,” or “dissolution of marriage,” legally terminates your marriage or domestic partnership. After you are legally divorced, you are considered “single” and are free to remarry or enter into a new domestic partnership. However, a divorce is not right for every couple.

If you want to end your financial and personal life with your partner, but do not want a legal divorce, there are other alternatives for you. Some people may choose to pursue a “legal separation” instead. This is often done for religious reasons. A legal separation does not end a marriage or domestic partnership. Rather, it allows you to live apart and make independent decisions on finances, property, and child care issues.

Another alternative to a divorce is an annulment. However, this option is very rare. An annulment occurs when a court finds that your marriage or domestic partnership was never valid in the first place. Marriages may be void because the marriage was incestuous, bigamous, fraudulent, or one of the spouses lacked capacity to enter into the marriage.

For more information about divorce, legal separation, and annulment, please contact our attorneys at Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri. Please remember that each individual situation is unique and results discussed in this post are not a guarantee of future results. While this post may include legal issues, it is not legal advice. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Posts